Date Index for January 1999

Feb 01, 1999 GMT

• Martin Leiderman, Re: RE: Trans-Persnal Psychology -- its coverage

Jan 31, 1999 GMT

• Bee Brown, Re: Astrology question
• Peter Merriott, RE: Trans-Persnal Psychology -- its coverage
• Alpha (Tony), Re: Oy vey
• Richard Taylor, Trans-Personal Psychology/Buddhism
• Richard Taylor, Oy vey
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: RE: Trans-Persnal Psychology -- its coverage == Antiquity of Man -- Modern evidence needed
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: RE: Trans-Persnal Psychology -- its coverage == Antiquity of Man -- Modern evidence needed, please
• Peter Merriott, RE: RE: Trans-Persnal Psychology -- its coverage == Antiquity of Man -- Modern evidence needed
• Peter Merriott, RE: Practical theosophy: was DEFENSE OF HPB and moving on.

Jan 30, 1999 GMT

• Alpha (Tony), Re: RE: Trans-Persnal Psychology -- its coverage == Antiquity of Man -- Modern evidence needed
• Alpha (Tony), Re: Re: Or a distraction from the true message of Theosophy
• Alpha (Tony), Re: RE: Trans-Persnal Psychology -- its coverage == Antiquity of Man -- Modern evidence needed, please
• Alpha (Tony), Re: Distractions vs. ignorance (avidya)
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Re:Theosophy and Activities
• Martin Leiderman, Re: A few questions on a touchy subject...What is the SOUL
• M K Ramadoss, Re:Theosophy and Activities

Jan 29, 1999 GMT

• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Trans-Persnal Psychology -- its coverage == Antiquity of Man -- Modern evidence needed
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: A few questions on a touchy subject...What is the SOUL = the MIND
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: RE: Trans-Persnal Psychology -- its coverage ==
• Peter Merriott, RE: RE: Trans-Personal Psychology
• Peter Merriott, RE: RE: Trans-Persnal Psychology -- its coverage == Antiquity of Man -- Modern evidence needed, please
• Peter Merriott, RE: Re: Distractions vs. ignorance (avidya)
• Andrew Rooke, Re: RE: Trans-Persnal Psychology -- its coverage ==
• Leon Maurer, Re: RE: Astrology question
• Daniel H Caldwell, Re: Distractions vs. ignorance (avidya)
• Leon Maurer, Re: Devachan and Tibetan Buddhism
• Daniel H Caldwell, Re: Or a distraction from the true message of Theosophy

Jan 28, 1999 GMT

• Martin Leiderman, Re: RE: Trans-Personal Psychology
• Richard Taylor, Distractions vs. ignorance (avidya)
• Nancy L Malcom, Re: A few questions on a touchy subject...
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: A few questions on a touchy subject...
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Trans-Persnal Psychology -- its coverage == Antiquity of Man -- Modern evidence needed, please
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: Peter/Paul on Self and selfishness
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Helping Others
• Chuck Cosimano, Re: A few questions on a touchy subject...
• Peter Merriott, RE: After-Death Bliss
• Jerry Schueler, Response to Rich
• Jerry Schueler, Re: theos-talk-digest V1 #697
• M K Ramadoss, Re: Theosophy - Active/Masculine
• Al Wilkinson, RE: Bye for now
• Alpha (Tony), Re: Re: Or a distraction from the true message of Theosophy
• Angie C., A few questions on a touchy subject...
• Pat Reda, Re: Bye for now
• Daniel H Caldwell, Re: Or a distraction from the true message of Theosophy
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Practical theosophy: The TWO SELVES in the Bhagavad Gita
• Alpha (Tony), Re: Peter/Paul on Self and selfishness

Jan 27, 1999 GMT

• Alpha (Tony), Re: Or a distraction from the true message of Theosophy
• Richard Taylor, Peter/Paul on Self and selfishness
• Alpha (Tony), RE: Practical theosophy: was DEFENSE OF HPB and moving on.
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: Practical theosophy: was DEFENSE OF HPB and moving on.
• Al Wilkinson, Bye for now
• Peter Merriott, RE: Practical theosophy: was DEFENSE OF HPB and moving on.
• Daniel H Caldwell, Or a distraction from the true message of Theosophy
• Alpha (Tony), Re: Practical theosophy: was DEFENSE OF HPB and moving on.
• Leon Maurer, Re: Please Leon Please Discuss a serious Theosophical Subject instead of writing your Diatribes against us awful Nitpickers
• Bart Lidofsky, Re: No Subject, No Object

Jan 26, 1999 GMT

• Bazzer (Paul), RE: Astrology question
• Richard Taylor, Re: Re: Rich asking about Quatrefages
• Peter Merriott, RE: Altering Facsimile Works -- *no*
• Alpha (Tony), Re: Rich asking about Quatrefages
• Richard Taylor, Re: Rich asking about Quatrefages
• Alpha (Tony), Re: Mahatmas
• Alpha (Tony), Re: Devachan in the Theosophical Glossary
• Alpha (Tony), Re: Mahatmas
• Daniel H Caldwell, More on Quatrefages

Jan 25, 1999 GMT

• Daniel H Caldwell, Rich asking about Quatrefages
• Richard Taylor, Altering Facsimile Works -- *no*
• Peter Merriott, RE: Astrology question
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: Mahatmas
• Chuck Cosimano, Re: Mahatmas
• Daniel H Caldwell, Devachan in the Theosophical Glossary
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: After-Death Bliss
• David Green, Re: Mahatmas
• Jerry Schueler, Quick Response to Dallas
• Peter Merriott, RE: After-Death Bliss
• Peter Merriott, Practical theosophy: was DEFENSE OF HPB and moving on.
• Alpha (Tony), Mahatmas
• Bee Brown, Re: Astrology question
• Daniel H Caldwell, Please Leon Please Discuss a serious Theosophical Subject instead of
• Leon Maurer, Re: Obstructionism, revisited
• Daniel H Caldwell, Leon versus the Nit Pickers
• Leon Maurer, Re: RE: DEFENSE OF HPB
• Leon Maurer, Re: Fw: Why Attack Fellow Theosophists?
• Leon Maurer, Re: Fw: RE: DEFENSE OF HPB and moving on.
• Leon Maurer, Re: Re: Re: Leon and Gelugpas
• Leon Maurer, Re: RE: RE: DEFENSE OF HPB and moving on.

Jan 24, 1999 GMT

• Alpha (Tony), Re: After-Death Bliss
• Richard Taylor, Trivia question
• Martin Leiderman, Re: on Devachan
• Richard Taylor, Re: After-Death Bliss
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: The SD as a Model == How to view Theosophical teachings
• Daniel H Caldwell, Re: Errors and their importance
• Jerry Schueler, After-Death Bliss
• Jerry Schueler, The SD as a Model
• Jerry Schueler, Devachan and Tibetan Buddhism
• Alpha (Tony), Re: Dallas wrote: "I am not interested in the philology [of Devachan]. . . .Be content with your view, and let me be happy with mine. Enough."
• Alpha (Tony), Re: Errors and their importance
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Dallas wrote: "I am not interested in the philology [of Devachan]. . . .Be content with your view, and let me be happy with mine. Enough."
• Peter I Walstra, RE: Astrology question
• Peter Merriott, RE: Dallas wrote: "I am not interested in the philology [of Devachan]. . . .Be content with your view, and let me be happy with mine. Enough."
• Peter Merriott, RE: Errors and their importance
• Daniel H Caldwell, Dallas wrote: "I am not interested in the philology [of Devachan]. . .
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: == HPB's use of words.
• Dallas TenBroeck, "Spiritual Immortal Man"
• Dallas TenBroeck, "Spiritual Immortal Man"
• Daniel H Caldwell, Re: Errors and their importance
• Daniel H Caldwell, Rich, Dallas and Devachan

Jan 23, 1999 GMT

• Richard Taylor, Obstructionism, revisited
• Alpha (Tony), Re: Errors and their importance
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Dallas on Devachan
• Richard Taylor, Dallas on Devachan
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Astrology question
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Rich on Devachan

Jan 22, 1999 GMT

• Bee Brown, Re: Astrology question
• Richard Taylor, Errors and their importance
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Rich on Devachan
• Leon Maurer, Re: Errors and their importance
• David Green, [6]U L T book attacks W Judge's letters about dead Mrs Blavatsky and K Tingley
• David Green, [5]James M Pryse's article on Rajah & W Judge
• David Green, [4]Rajah is name for W Judge
• David Green, [3] K Tingley channels discarnate Judge
• David Green, [2]W Judge to K Tingley re dead Mrs Blavatsky communications
• David Green, [1] W Judge's 1895 letter on messages from dead Mrs Blavatsky
• Daniel H Caldwell, Rich on Devachan

Jan 21, 1999 GMT

• Richard Taylor, Errors and their importance
• Richard Taylor, Chinese term ching
• Dallas TenBroeck, FW: SHANGRILA == Report from NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Astrology question
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: RE: DEFENSE OF HPB and moving on.
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: RE: AC/HPB/I-Ching
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: RE: No Subject, No Object
• M K Ramadoss, Re: Astrology question
• Jerry Schueler, Ends Justifies the Means?
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Fw: Why Attack Fellow Theosophists?
• Jerry Schueler, Response to Leon and Rich
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Fw: RE: DEFENSE OF HPB and moving on.
• Peter Merriott, RE: Re: Re: An Old un-Theosophical prejudice.
• Peter Merriott, RE: Why Attack Fellow Theosophists? or If the fruit fits they shall be known by it
• Peter Merriott, RE: RE: DEFENSE OF HPB and moving on.
• Leon Maurer, Re: RE: AC/HPB/I-Ching
• Leon Maurer, Re: RE: No Subject, No Object
• Bee Brown, Re: Astrology question
• Richard Taylor, Re: Astrology question
• Bee Brown, Astrology question
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: No Subject, No Object
• Darren Porter, Re: Why Attack Fellow Theosophists? or If the fruit fits they shall be known by it

Jan 20, 1999 GMT

• Bazzer (Paul), RE: RE: DEFENSE OF HPB and moving on.
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: RE: AC/HPB/I-Ching
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Re: Re: An Old un-Theosophical prejudice.
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Re: Re: An Old un-Theosophical prejudice.
• Leon Maurer, Re: RE: AC & HPB == THE SWASTIKA
• Leon Maurer, No Subject, No Object
• Leon Maurer, Re: Why Attack Fellow Theosophists?
• Richard Taylor, Re: RE: DEFENSE OF HPB and moving on.
• Richard Taylor, Re: RE: AC/HPB/I-Ching
• Richard Taylor, Re: Re: Re: An Old un-Theosophical prejudice.

Jan 19, 1999 GMT

• Peter Merriott, RE: DEFENSE OF HPB and moving on.
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Obstructionism and BUDHISM (one D).
• Leon Maurer, Re: Re: An Old un-Theosophical prejudice.
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: AC/HPB/I-Ching
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Obstructionism and BUDHISM (one D).
• Bart Lidofsky, Re: AC/HPB/I-Ching
• Richard Taylor, RE: DEFENSE OF HPB

Jan 18, 1999 GMT

• Frank Reitemeyer, January 17th
• Jerry Schueler, Re: RE: DEFENCE OF HPB == Esoteric or Exoteric ?
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: RE: DEFENCE OF HPB == Esoteric or Exoteric ?
• Jerry Schueler, Why Attack Fellow Theosophists?
• Jerry Schueler, Re: RE: DEFENCE OF HPB == Esoteric or Exoteric ?
• Leon Maurer, Re: Tibetan Book of the Dead & Theosophy
• Leon Maurer, Re: Tibetan Book of the Dead & Theosophy
• Leon Maurer, Re: Obstructionism and BUDHISM (one D).
• Richard Taylor, Obstructionism and BUDHISM (one D).

Jan 17, 1999 GMT

• Dallas TenBroeck, A few Quotations from theosophical sources
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: DEFENCE OF HPB == Esoteric or Exoteric ?
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: RE: AC/HPB/I-Ching
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: RE: Response to Rich
• Leon Maurer, Re: RE: AC/HPB/I-Ching
• Leon Maurer, Re: RE: Response to Rich
• Leon Maurer, Re: Response to Rich
• Leon Maurer, Re: AC & HPB

Jan 16, 1999 GMT

• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: HPB == HPB on SUNYA and SUNYATA
• Barbara Reiff, Re: theos-talk-digest V1 #668

Jan 15, 1999 GMT

• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Response to Rich == DARKNESS emanative of LIGHT == "EMPTINESS," "VOID" "SPACE"
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: Response to Rich
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: AC & HPB == THE SWASTIKA
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Response to Rich
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Re: Tibetan Book of the Dead & Theosophy
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Re: Tibetan Book of the Dead & Theosophy
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Response to Rich
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Response to Rich
• Darren Porter, More on the Bardo Thodrol
• Darren Porter, Re: Re: Tibetan Book of the Dead & Theosophy
• Darren Porter, Re: AC & HPB
• Peter Merriott, RE: HPB - agent of the Mahatmas
• Richard Taylor, Tibetan Book of the Dead & Theosophy
• Richard Taylor, Response to Rich
• Richard Taylor, Re: RE: Response to Rich
• Leon Maurer, Re: AC & HPB
• Leon Maurer, Re: Re: Tibetan Book of the Dead & Theosophy
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Response to Rich

Jan 14, 1999 GMT

• Bazzer (Paul), RE: Re: Tibetan Book of the Dead & Theosophy
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: Response to Rich
• Bart Lidofsky, Re: AC & HPB
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Response to Rich
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Tibetan Book of the Dead & Theosophy
• Gerry Druckerman, Re: HPB - agent of the Mahatmas
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: AC & HPB
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: Response to Rich
• Al Wilkinson, RE: HPB - agent of the Mahatmas
• Al Wilkinson, On the I-Ching
• Richard Taylor, Re: RE: AC/HPB/I-Ching == On the I-Ching
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: AC/HPB/I-Ching == On the I-Ching
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: AC & HPB
• Peter Merriott, HPB - agent of the Mahatmas
• Al Wilkinson, RE: HPB/I-Ching
• Richard Taylor, Re: Red Caps and Padmasambhava
• Leon Maurer, Re: AC & HPB
• Darren Porter, RE: AC/HPB/I-Ching
• Darren Porter, Re: AC & HPB
• Darren Porter, Red Caps and Padmasambhava

Jan 13, 1999 GMT

• Leon Maurer, Re: Response to Rich
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Response to Rich == Who and where is GAUTAMA BUDDHA today ?
• Daniel H Caldwell, Dallas talks about Indexes to Blavatsky's Writings
• Al Wilkinson, RE: AC/HPB/I-Ching
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: AC/HPB -- "Black Magic"
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Three fundamental propositions
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Response to Rich
• Leon Maurer, Re: AC & HPB
• Leon Maurer, Re: AC/HPB
• Leon Maurer, Re: Three fundamental propositions
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: == PRATYEKHA BUDDHA and NIRVANA
• Bart Lidofsky, Re: AC/HPB
• Bart Lidofsky, Re: AC & HPB

Jan 12, 1999 GMT

• Richard Taylor, Terms
• Richard Taylor, Re: AC/HPB
• Richard Taylor, Buddhas and bodhisattvas
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: HPB -- What is the Theosophy that she taught ? How valuable is it to us to consider ?
• Richard Taylor, Three fundamental propositions
• Richard Taylor, Re: Response to Rich
• Richard Taylor, Re: Despised/lowest/dead letter. . . Pratyeka Buddhas
• Richard Taylor, Re: RE: Mindless quotes
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: AC/HPB and the Launching of the TS
• M K Ramadoss, RE: [1] W Judge's 1895 letter on messages from dead Mrs Blavatsky
• Leon Maurer, Re: AC/HPB
• Leon Maurer, Re: AC/HPB
• Chuck Cosimano, Re: AC/HPB
• Leon Maurer, Re: AC/HPB
• Leon Maurer, Re: AC & HPB
• Leon Maurer, Re: AC & HPB
• Mike Perala, Re: theos-talk-digest V1 #657

Jan 11, 1999 GMT

• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: [1] W Judge's 1895 letter on messages from dead Mrs Blavatsky
• Jerry Schueler, Re: AC/HPB
• Jerry Schueler, Response to Rich
• Jerry Schueler, Re: AC/HPB
• Jerry Schueler, Re: AC & HPB
• Jerry Schueler, Re: AC & HPB
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Re: AC & HPB
• Bazzer (Paul), Despised/lowest/dead letter. . . Pratyeka Buddhas
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: Mindless quotes
• Bazzer (Paul), Arhat/Arhan etc.
• David Green, [6]U L T book attacks W Judge's letters about dead Mrs Blavatsky and K Tingley
• David Green, [5]James M Pryse's article on Rajah & W Judge
• David Green, [4]Rajah is name for W Judge
• David Green, [3] K Tingley channels discarnate Judge
• David Green, [2]W Judge to K Tingley re dead Mrs Blavatsky communications
• David Green, [1] W Judge's 1895 letter on messages from dead Mrs Blavatsky
• Leon Maurer, Re: Re: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Leon Maurer, Re: RE: AC & HPB
• Leon Maurer, Re: RE: Re: AC & HPB
• Leon Maurer, Re: Re: AC & HPB
• Daniel H Caldwell, Some Observations on the Claims made by Boris de Zirkoff and others
• Chuck Cosimano, Re: WHO PLAYED THAT TRICK ON H.P.B.? THE PUZZLE OF "THE THEOSOPH...
• Chuck Cosimano, Re: AC/HPB
• Daniel H Caldwell, WHO PLAYED THAT TRICK ON H.P.B.? THE PUZZLE OF "THE THEOSOPHICAL

Jan 10, 1999 GMT

• Richard Taylor, Re: AC/HPB
• Richard Taylor, Mindless quotes
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: AC & HPB
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: Re: AC & HPB
• Dallas TenBroeck, FW: Crowley vs Theosophical "Path"
• Dallas TenBroeck, Some Quotes from Theosophical Sources
• Eldon B Tucker, THEOSOPHY WORLD and theos-talk
• Jerry Schueler, Re: AC & HPB
• Al Wilkinson, AC/HPB
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: AC & HPB
• Richard Taylor, Re: Re: AC & HPB
• M K Ramadoss, Re: AC & HPB
• Darren Porter, Re: A person and his teachings/character/life
• Leon Maurer, Re: AC & HPB

Jan 09, 1999 GMT

• Jerry Schueler, Re: Shangri-la found
• Jerry Schueler, Re: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Jerry Schueler, Re: A person and his teachings/character/life
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Response to Dallas
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Helping Humanity
• Chuck Cosimano, Re: Shangri-la found
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: theos-l digest: January 08, 1999 == Kym's posting and question -- death and grieving
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Martin Leiderman, Shangri-la found
• Darren Porter, Re: A person and his teachings/character/life
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Response to Dallas

Jan 08, 1999 GMT

• M K Ramadoss, Re: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Jerry Schueler, Re: A person and his teachings/character/life
• Jerry Schueler, Re: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Jerry Schueler, AC & HPB
• Jerry Schueler, Re: A person and his teachings/character/life
• Jerry Schueler, Response to Dallas
• M K Ramadoss, Re: A person and his teachings/character/life
• Dallas TenBroeck, Kym's memo of Jan 4th == an attempt at answering
• Al Wilkinson, Re: A person and his teachings/character/life
• M K Ramadoss, Re: A person and his teachings/character/life

Jan 07, 1999 GMT

• Bazzer (Paul), RE: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B. or THEOSOPHY ?
• Eldon B Tucker, Re: A person and his teachings/character/life
• Al Wilkinson, Re: A person and his teachings/character/life
• Chuck Cosimano, Re: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Chuck Cosimano, Re: An Old un-Theosophical prejudice.

Jan 06, 1999 GMT

• Richard Taylor, Re: Fwd: Request for assistance (from an non-subscriber)
• Jerry Schueler, Re: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: An Old un-Theosophical prejudice.
• Eldon B Tucker, Fwd: Request for assistance (from an non-subscriber)
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Re: Paranoid Theosophists
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• M K Ramadoss, Re: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Bart Lidofsky, Re: A person and his teachings/character/life

Jan 05, 1999 GMT

• Darren Porter, Re: An Old un-Theosophical prejudice.
• Bazzer (Paul), RE: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Jerry Schueler, Re: A person and his teachings/character/life
• Jerry Schueler, Re: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Jerry Schueler, Re: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Jerry Schueler, Re: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Paraniod Theosophists
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: To Leon in brotherhood, - WHAT ARE TH TOOLS THAT HAVE BEEN OFFERED TO US ?
• M K Ramadoss, Re: A person and his teachings/character/life
• Leon Maurer, Re: Paranoid Theosophists?
• Martin Leiderman, To Leon in brotherhood, I hope
• Richard Taylor, Re: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Darren Porter, That Damn Gag
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Al Wilkinson, A person and his teachings/character/life
• M K Ramadoss, Re: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Al Wilkinson, Re: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?
• Bart Lidofsky, Re: RE: ARE WE QUALIFIED TO CRITICIZE H.P.B.?

Jan 04, 1999 GMT

• John Vorstermans, Re: An Old un-Theosophical prejudice.
• Jerry Schueler, Paranoid Theosophists?
• Jerry Schueler, Re: An Old un-Theosophical prejudice.
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Questions for Rich, Jerry, Dallas et al concerning what the M...
• Richard Taylor, Re: Re: An Old un-Theosophical prejudice.

Jan 03, 1999 GMT

• Chuck Cosimano, Re: Questions for Rich, Jerry, Dallas et al concerning what the M...
• Leon Maurer, Re: An Old un-Theosophical prejudice.
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: An Old un-Theosophical prejudice. == Prejudice ? On what basis ?
• Leon Maurer, Re: Re: Re: Questions for Rich, Jerry, Dallas et al concerning what the Mahatmas are talking about in their references about "Shammars", "Dugpas" etc.
• Dallas TenBroeck, Some Quotations from Theosophical sources
• Richard Taylor, An Old un-Theosophical prejudice.
• Leon Maurer, Re: Re: Questions for Rich, Jerry, Dallas et al concerning what the Mahatmas are talking about in their references about "Shammars", "Dugpas" etc.
• M K Ramadoss, Sex and Spiritual Practices

Jan 02, 1999 GMT

• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Re: -More on "karmamudra" == "Creation" and "polarity." How does Karma work ?
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Re: A Blavatsky Student Gives View on "Karmamudra"----More on "karmamudra": READER BEWARE---THIS IS SOMEWHAT DISTASTEFUL AND POSSIBILY EVEN "X-RATED" TO SOME
• Jerry Schueler, Re: Re: Questions for Rich, Jerry, Dallas et al concerning what the Mahatmas are talking about in their references about "Shammars", "Dugpas" etc.
• Chuck Cosimano, Re: Questions for Rich, Jerry, Dallas et al concerning what the M...
• Daniel H Caldwell, Re: A Blavatsky Student Gives View on "Karmamudra"----More on
• M K Ramadoss, Re: Questions for Rich, Jerry, Dallas et al concerning what @@ the Mahatmas are talking about in their references about "Shammars",
• M K Ramadoss, Re: Krishnamurti on CWL's Clairvoyance
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: Questions for Rich, Jerry, Dallas et al concerning what the Mahatmas are talking about in their references about "Shammars", "Dugpas" etc.
• Martin Leiderman, Re: Krishnamurti on CWL's Clairvoyance
• Martin Leiderman, Re: Questions for Rich, Jerry, Dallas et al concerning what
• Leon Maurer, Re: Re: Questions for Rich, Jerry, Dallas et al concerning what the Mahatmas are talking about in their references about "Shammars", "Dugpas" etc.

Jan 01, 1999 GMT

• M K Ramadoss, Conversations with Krishnamurti 5/5
• M K Ramadoss, Conversations with Krishnamurti 4/5
• M K Ramadoss, Conversations with Krishnamurti 3/5
• M K Ramadoss, Conversations with Krishnamurti 2/5
• M K Ramadoss, Conversations with Krishnamurti 1/5
• M K Ramadoss, Re: Krishnamurti on CWL's Clairvoyance
• Martin Leiderman, Re: Krishnamurti on CWL's Clairvoyance
• David Green, WQ Judge's 1895 letter on messages from dead Mrs Blavatsky
• Dallas TenBroeck, RE: theos-l digest: December 31, 1998 == "Rebels" who delayed incarnation into physical mankind