Theos-Talk Archives (January 1999 Message tt00178)

Jan 14th

Void, emptiness, the non-manifest, the Causeless-cause, the
unnamable, the immutable, the necessary "background" to
manifestation - do these not suggest to you what the Buddha may
in some translator's eyes called "emptiness ?''

Dallas TenBroeck

> From: Jerry Schueler
> Sent:	Thursday, January 14, 1999 1:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Response to Rich

>"Thus the reader is asked to bear in mind the very important
difference
>between *orthodox* Buddhism - i.e., the public teachings of
Guatama the
>Buddha, and his esoteric *Budhism*."
>


Do you know this difference?  Actually the Theravadin teachings
are
the orthodox Buddhism, and the Mahayana (at least according to
the Mahayanists) have the esoteric teachings.  There are,
according
to the Tibetan schools, three such levels of Buddha's teachings.
The
lowest addresses the Sutras, which is where HPB got virtually all
of her Buddhism (Olcott never got much higher than this anywhere
that
I can tell).  Most of her teaching was directed toward the masses
and only her Voice contains any real esotericism.  Probably the
single most
important teaching in all Buddhism is emptiness, and this HPB
never
discusses. .  I will probably get flames for this, but it is my
opinion
after years
of comparison work, and I would challenge anyone who disagrees to
do
more than just vent their spleen and show sources.

Jerry S.


theos-talk@theosophy.com

of