Theos-Talk Archives (January 1999 Message tt00088)

>As MKR posts recently, original TS Objects broached the question of the
>relevance of gender way before A.C., as did the (genuine) Mystery Scools
>etc. (NB: original TS Objects phrase it as "without distinction" of sex,
>race, etc., which is not necessarily the same as "equality" of the sexes.
>That which is sex-less has no need of "equality".  Neither, for that
matter,
>did HPB).
>

Agreed.  But then again, "that which is sex-less" has no need for
much of anything.

>The motion of cycles/ages has been taught for millennia. A.C.'s "new age"
is
>hardly divine revelation (even assuming it is a correct interpretation).
As
>we know, there are 'ages' within 'ages', each with its particular
>theme/relevance.
>

His Aeon of Horus came at the new Age of Aquarius anyway, so
I think we all agree that we are beginning a new age of some kind.


>Is it a correct understanding that A.C.'s contribution to "equality of the
>sexes" also ran to the generous use of sex stimulents (e.g. 'sex appeal'
>perfumes) and a sustained entorage of female 'disciples'?
>

Uncle's Al's writings have helped contribute to an equality of the
sexes, but not his personal behavior or attitude.  Most biographies
show him more than just a little sexist.

Jerry S.