HPB & St. Germain
Nov 28, 2006 01:57 PM
by carlosaveline
Carl,
Mesmer did scarcely more than phenomena.
Phenomena was a minor aspect of HPB's work.
True, St. Germain did not write.
But St. Germain was dealing with the course of History as a whole, as HPB was.
St. Germain and HPB were facing the tide of world events", and this seems to correspond to a particular moment in the lives of Initiates, that moment described in the NT Gospels.
I am not saying that Mesmer was not significant. And Cagliostro was meaningful, too.
I am not saying that this viewpoint of mine is the only one possible.
I am not not saying that HPB was the only Messenger in the end of the 19th century, either.
Both HPB and St. Germain came with a group of souls to work in their end-of-centuries.
Regards, Carlos.
De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Cópia:
Data:Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:15:55 -0000
Assunto:Theos-World Re: HPB & St. Germain
> What I meant was that Mesmer was Blavatsky's contra part as The
> Messenger. I also see St. Germain as a greater Occultist then
> Mesmer, but it was Mesmer that was The Messenger to the West for the
> 18th century.
> So also Mesmer had direct contact with the source, and the source
> was and is the Brotherhood of the Masters, which is not a
> geographical place.
>
> Carl
>
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline"
> wrote:
> >
> > Carl,
> >
> > You say:
> >
> > "I personally can't see any reason to believe that St. Germain was
> > Blavatsky's contra part during the 18th century."
> >
> > You are free not to see that, but both HPB and the ML suggested
> the idea, which is far from being originally mine.
> >
> > Mesmer and others (including Cagliostro) did not have the same
> degree of occult learning as HPB and St. Germain had. Both had
> direct contact with the source, and for both "HOME" was -- in the
> Himalayas, not in Europe.
> >
> > Carlos.
> >
> >
> > De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Cópia:
> >
> > Data:Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:59:31 -0000
> >
> > Assunto:Theos-World The 18th century Messengers
> >
> > > The 18th century Messengers
> > >
> > > I personally can't see any reason to believe that St. Germain
> was
> > > Blavatsky's contra part during the 18th century. More are
> pointing
> > > at Dr. Franz Anton Mesmer, which had at his side as co-worker,
> St.
> > > Germain (Mesmer's "Judge"), Cagliostro (Mesmer's "Olcott", the
> > > organiser) and initially Chev. Casanova (similar to Crowley in
> many
> > > ways, maybe a fallen lay chela). Both the memoirs of Mesmer and
> > > Casanova are giving some interesting information on this
> subject,
> > > and the biographical notes in trial protocol of Cagliostro's as
> well.
> > >
> > > And there is nothing at al, that are pointing in the direction
> that
> > > Prince Rakoczi and Count St. Germain was one and the same
> person.
> > >
> > > Who of al this 18th century occultists, which was (or are today)
> an
> > > Adept, I do not dare to say, but some of them was defiantly
> Chelas
> > > or Lay Chelas.
> > >
> > > Carl
> > >
> > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Konstantin,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > It is consensus, see Clara Codd's book for example, that St.
> > > Germain as 18th century incarnation was not a full Adept.
> > > >
> > > > Besides, it is a firm consensus and common knowledge that only
> > > disciples, and never Adepts, mix with public and
> political/social
> > > events in the way St. Germain (or Cagliostro) interfered.
> > > >
> > > > The reason for that is that an Adept is outside short term
> human
> > > karma and he is not willing to go against evolution and go back
> in
> > > his path.
> > > >
> > > > This is also a key concept to understand the necessary
> Autonomy of
> > > the Disciple.
> > > >
> > > > In the ML, Masters explain that if Disciples were not
> Autonomous
> > > and Responsible for their own actions, the Karma would belong to
> > > their Teachers, and not to them.
> > > >
> > > > Therefore St. Germain, who strongly interacted with political,
> > > public and social issues, was not an Adept.
> > > >
> > > > The incarnation in which an Initiate will get the decisive
> > > initiation needs to be a new one. Magnetical reasons included.
> > > >
> > > > Besides, the Leadbeaterian ritualistic fancies, ascribed to
> St.
> > > Germain, clash in substance and content with the Masters'
> teachings,
> > > while we know that the Teachings of different Masters never
> clash
> > > except in wording.
> > > >
> > > > Finally, you can see that the large amount of wild
> > > ritualisticfancies (including the ER) created by poor Leadbeater
> and
> > > ascribed to "St. Germain" were no more than fancies, while an
> Adept
> > > does not do that kind of thing.
> > > >
> > > > So, you see there is a mass of hints and evidences about that.
> > > >
> > > > Regards, Carlos.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > >
> > > > Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > >
> > > > Cópia:
> > > >
> > > > Data:Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:31:35 -0000
> > > >
> > > > Assunto:Theos-World Re: St. Germain Not Leadbeaterian, At All
> > > >
> > > > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline"
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Rakoczi is a name which also corresponds to the same
> > > incarnation as
> > > > > "St. Germain".
> > > > >
> > > > > As far I know, nor Leadbeater neither any other theosophical
> > > author
> > > > > who regards St. Germain an adept, didn't hold an opinion
> that he
> > > died
> > > > > in the end of 18th century.
> > > > > Leadbeater when wrote about 1911 meant certainly the same
> > > incarnation.
> > > > >
> > > > > From the other sources we can conclude that St. Germain was
> an
> > > adept
> > > > > already in 18th century, otherwise it would be hard to
> explain
> > > how the
> > > > > old ladies recognized in him a man whom they knew in their
> > > youth, and
> > > > > still looking young when they were already old.
> > > > >
> > > > > So Leadbeater had to need to invent any new names and
> > > incarnations.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente
> Terra.
> > > > > Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> > > > > http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?
> > >
> +_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1164562729.821334.23018.caneria.hst.terra.com.
> > > br,4219,Des15,Des15
> > > > >
> > > > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> > > > > Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 24/11/2006 /
> > > Versão: 4.4.00/4904
> > > > > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente Terra.
> > > Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> > > http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?
> +_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1164686432.256523.7214.arrino.hst.terra.com.br
> ,7900,Des15,Des15
> > >
> > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> > > Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 27/11/2006 /
> Versão: 4.4.00/4905
> > > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
> E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente Terra.
> Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1164724995.349683.22203.balcomo.hst.terra.com.br,10299,Des15,Des15
>
> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 27/11/2006 / Versão: 4.4.00/4905
> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application