Theos-Talk Archives (November 2006 Message tt00926)

Jake,

As you probably know now, Gregory Tillett wrote:

=====================================================
The DES claimed to be on "the original lines" of the ES under HPB. It
taught that HPB remained the Real Head of the School, and wherever
she was referred to, capital letters (including She and Her) are used.
=====================================================
Quoted from: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/36730

If the claim is made in the ULT's Dzyan Esoteric School that HPB is
the Real Head of the School, exactly what does that claim IMPLY or
actually mean?

Furthermore, remember what HPB said in the "Preliminary Memorandum":

"The real Head of the Esoteric Section is a Master, of whom H.P.
Blavatsky is the mouthpiece for this Section. . . . It is through
H.P. Blavatsky that each member of this section will be brought more
closely than hitherto under His influence and care if found worthy of
it."
Quoted from: http://www.katinkahesselink.net/esinstr.htm#prelim1

THEREFORE does this claim by the DES imply such a potential 
relationship or even "contact" in light of what HPB was writing about 
in 1888?

In my series of examples given to you about forming an esoteric
group at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/37242

and 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/37349

if Victor in the 1890s or Glen in the 1970s made a similar
claim that in their esoteric groups HPB is the real head, would that
be any DIFFERENT or LESS VALID than what the Dzyan Esoteric School is
claiming????

Daniel
http://hpb.cc