Theos-Talk Archives (June 2006 Message tt00183)

FRIENDS,

The theosophical movement is a probationary field. It is not meant 
to be a garden of roses. Some kind theosophical souls, when still 
developing Vairagya (discernment), can't tell the difference between 
traitors and "heretics". 

It is not too difficult.  Independent thinkers (seen as "heretics") 
serve no centralized bureaucracy. They do not look for money. They 
challenge ritualistic  make-belief systems. So did H.P. Blavatsky in 
the 19th century.   

Her accusers, in fact slanderers, were at first funded and used by 
Roman Catholicism or other Churces to attack the movement, because 
Theosophy was "dangerous".  But since the end of 20th century 
slanderers are protected or tolerated by Adyar's Liberal Catholic 
Church and other power mechanisms.  

John Algeo, for instance, is ven now the international vice-
president of the Adyar TS. And he is trying to put forged, libelous 
texts into the theosophical literature. 

These guys have the "power".  What about heretics?  Heretics are 
those who defend the founder of the theosophical movement. 

Thanks to the good Karma, there will always be independent thinkers 
though. 


Regards,  Carlos Cardoso Aveline