Dallas- Fundamentalist Misrepresentations and Theosophical Basics
Apr 07, 2006 07:09 PM
by Vincent
You wrote:
> Thanks, excuse my brevity and see notes below in text. If not
clear then
> ask again.
Okay, thanks.
> Let me say at the outset that THEOSOPHY, to me, is NOT one of the
religions,
> philosophies or sciences, but, as HPB presents it, it is a
synopsis (or
> précis) of the wisdom available to all great Initiates [Mahatmas]
as also to
> the ATMA-BUDDHIC PRINCIPLE in each one of us, as a MONAD . We
instinctively
> know when something is not TRUE -- conscience ? ]
Must one be a Theosophist to be a mahatma?
> I consider it futile to try to adjust theosophical terminology to
that used
> in current Western scientific debate. [A library would be
needed. To
> abbreviate the effort I suggest learning a new language:
THEOSOPHY -- and
> its special meanings. This will be found to include a review of
history as
> we know it and a number of adjustments will have to be made to
that. Above
> all, we need to be carefully analyzing the concepts and processes
of
> self-discipline offered on the `Path" of self-purification, for
their
> fairness and accuracy.
I'm still learning Theosophical terms. It is all new to me.
> This may appear arbitrary. But if we wish to learn about
THEOSOPHY first we
> have to learn exactly what THEOSOPHY teaches.
Of which I am largely ignorant.
> Then we can compare those statements [facts to its deeper
students] with
> modern science and its scholarly debates in many directions.
Okay.
> First we may observe some similarities.
>
>
>
> 1 "GOD," as concept, regardless of any credal "Name" is
employed to
> indicate the prevalence of the primal original and unchanging
PRINCIPLE of
> LIFE in SPACE, that pervades the whole of manifestation:
>
>
>
> "Since time began, and before there was beginning --
>
> All things march to its drumming."
I'm agnostic regarding the existence of a cosmological supergod
(omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent), yet I believe that the
universe itself is much larger than the meager god concepts commonly
entertained by humanity.
> 2 DURATION includes all cycles as divisions of TIME,
whether
> manifested (manvantara) or non-manifested (pralaya), whether
objective or
> subjective.
I don't believe that durations of time exist in the context of
eternity. Eternity is above time, and therefore above durations.
> 3 A single LAW [KARMA] of honesty and justice prevails,
unbroken
> and uniformly. All beings are its subjects. No being has the
power to
> alter the EFFECTS which earlier CAUSES have set. Its ideal
is "duty" --
> DHARMA.
I believe in karma, but not reincarnation.
> 4 CONSCIOUSNESS Is the ability to perceive along
with any
> other being, on any other plane of intelligent action or
perception.
I fully agree. And there are an endless number of dimensional
planes.
> 5 All forms are temporary projections of an INTELLIGENCE
which is
> not entirely subject to experience (thought, act, feeling) in any
plane.
> The reincarnation of "Intelligence" is the 'Path' of the human
monadic
> progress at present.
Which 'intelligence' are you referring to?
> 6 The "ATOM" (as a basic unit of matter) is
indestructible,
> eternally (and cyclically) active in the framework of its own (as
well as of
> the universal) program.
What about when atoms are split? That's called an 'atom bomb'.
> 7 The "GOAL" of all individual/personal experience
through
> 'evolution,' is a perfect knowledge of LAW and of the power of
choice. It
> also recognizes the superior force of thought to psychism (also
defined as
> sentiment and emotion -- likes and dislikes).
A perfect knowledge of law? What law? Are you referring to the law
of karma?
> Here are what seems to me to be basic concepts found in all.
>
>
>
>
>
> 1. GOD -- DEITY -- UNIVERSE -- NATURE -- SPACE
(to me:
> synonyms)
>
> They are ALL inclusive, whether objective (in material tangible
forms) or
> "subjective" (in ideas, thoughts, fancies, personal concepts and
preferences
> or likes, etc., )
Okay.
> 2. MONADS [ATMA (Spirit) and BUDDHI (Wisdom -- knowledge
of facts,
> laws and karma of NATURE ) eternally conjoined. The opposing pole
is the
> material "atom." [Itself, a definite and fixed, 'personal' focus
of energy.]
Yes, I believe that it's all connected together.
> 3. Therefore, as the WHOLE UNIVERSE consists of
these "spiritually
> wise Monads," each is as ancient as any other (an
ancient "brotherhood" in
> fact). To each, a "material" atomic counterpart is fixed.
Are you referring to reincarnate forms?
> 4. Their "WISDOM [Buddhi]," includes for final reference,
an exact
> and actual pictorial HISTORY of all events over vast periods of
both
> manifested and non-manifested TIME [manvantaras and pralayas
impacted in
> Akasa. Thereon, the 'Path" (choices made by each free-willed
independent
> Monad) that lead to the present exactitude of effects and
circumstances) of
> each Monad can be retraced.].
Retraced? To where? How?
> KARMA: In this all-inclusive LAW, their (individual;
and
> collective) 'WISDOM' may also be grasped as KARMA.
>
>
>
> That implies a knowledge of all causal factors
(choices made by
> each free-willed independent Monad) that lead to the present
exactitude of
> effects and circumstances All Monads of whatever level of
experience embody
> and include these factors. There can be no concealment, evasion, or
> "influencing" any Karmic factor anywhere, or at any time -- from
the vast
> past up to now.
Okay. I believe that everything in the universe balances itself
out. We just fail to see the big picture sometimes, so the world
commonly appears very imbalanced to us.
> 5. They [Monads] entirely pervade "SPACE" -- they are
SPACE, and
> have always been there and will continue to be there.
So monads never leave space to walk reincarnately? Are
reincarnations just projections of supernatural beings that never
leave the supernatural realm to begin with?
> 6. The Monad serves as a "connection" between the
uncountable
> continually changing "personal forms" of matter in which
INTELLIGENCE is
> refining itself by self-effort.
Again, which 'intelligence' are you referring to?
> 7. "EVOLUTION" is defined for Monads in the "human stage,"
as a
> moral struggle -- it is selfishness (of the personal emotional
inclinations)
> vs. universality (or the impersonality) that is to be rigidly
applied to all
> decisions. It is the transformation by WILL of the Kama-Manasic
into the
> Budhi-Manasic
Okay.
> Currently, the fiery debate relative to "Intelligent Design," and,
> "Evolutionary Development" merely points to the underlying nature
of
> personal (material) INTELLIGENCE gradually (spiritually)
individualizing
> itself under the general laws of universal spiritual and
impersonal effort.
An evolving intelligence is certainly not omniscient.
> Truth is no respecter of persons – let those of sluggish toes
beware. Often
> "tact" closely borders on untruth. In the long run, honesty of
speech is
> more valuable and less time-wasting.
I fully agree.
> I write this after many years checking and re-checking .
Thank you so much.
Blessings
Vince
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "W.Dallas TenBroeck"
<dalval14@...> wrote:
>
> 4/5/2006 6:28 AM
>
>
>
> RE: Dallas - Fundamentalist misrepresentations &
>
> Theosophical basics
>
>
>
> Dear V:
>
>
>
> Thanks, excuse my brevity and see notes below in text. If not
clear then
> ask again.
>
>
>
> Let me say at the outset that THEOSOPHY, to me, is NOT one of the
religions,
> philosophies or sciences, but, as HPB presents it, it is a
synopsis (or
> précis) of the wisdom available to all great Initiates [Mahatmas]
as also to
> the ATMA-BUDDHIC PRINCIPLE in each one of us, as a MONAD . We
instinctively
> know when something is not TRUE -- conscience ? ]
>
>
>
> I consider it futile to try to adjust theosophical terminology to
that used
> in current Western scientific debate. [A library would be
needed. To
> abbreviate the effort I suggest learning a new language:
THEOSOPHY -- and
> its special meanings. This will be found to include a review of
history as
> we know it and a number of adjustments will have to be made to
that. Above
> all, we need to be carefully analyzing the concepts and processes
of
> self-discipline offered on the `Path" of self-purification, for
their
> fairness and accuracy.
>
>
>
> This may appear arbitrary. But if we wish to learn about
THEOSOPHY first we
> have to learn exactly what THEOSOPHY teaches.
>
>
>
> Then we can compare those statements [facts to its deeper
students] with
> modern science and its scholarly debates in many directions.
>
>
>
>
>
> First we may observe some similarities.
>
>
>
> 1 "GOD," as concept, regardless of any credal "Name" is
employed to
> indicate the prevalence of the primal original and unchanging
PRINCIPLE of
> LIFE in SPACE, that pervades the whole of manifestation:
>
>
>
> "Since time began, and before there was beginning --
>
> All things march to its drumming."
>
>
>
> 2 DURATION includes all cycles as divisions of TIME,
whether
> manifested (manvantara) or non-manifested (pralaya), whether
objective or
> subjective.
>
>
>
> 3 A single LAW [KARMA] of honesty and justice prevails,
unbroken
> and uniformly. All beings are its subjects. No being has the
power to
> alter the EFFECTS which earlier CAUSES have set. Its ideal
is "duty" --
> DHARMA.
>
>
>
> 4 CONSCIOUSNESS Is the ability to perceive along
with any
> other being, on any other plane of intelligent action or
perception.
>
>
>
> 5 All forms are temporary projections of an INTELLIGENCE
which is
> not entirely subject to experience (thought, act, feeling) in any
plane.
> The reincarnation of "Intelligence" is the 'Path' of the human
monadic
> progress at present.
>
>
>
> 6 The "ATOM" (as a basic unit of matter) is
indestructible,
> eternally (and cyclically) active in the framework of its own (as
well as of
> the universal) program.
>
>
>
> 7 The "GOAL" of all individual/personal experience
through
> 'evolution,' is a perfect knowledge of LAW and of the power of
choice. It
> also recognizes the superior force of thought to psychism (also
defined as
> sentiment and emotion -- likes and dislikes).
>
>
>
>
>
> Here are what seems to me to be basic concepts found in all.
>
>
>
>
>
> 1. GOD -- DEITY -- UNIVERSE -- NATURE -- SPACE
(to me:
> synonyms)
>
> They are ALL inclusive, whether objective (in material tangible
forms) or
> "subjective" (in ideas, thoughts, fancies, personal concepts and
preferences
> or likes, etc., )
>
>
>
> 2. MONADS [ATMA (Spirit) and BUDDHI (Wisdom -- knowledge
of facts,
> laws and karma of NATURE ) eternally conjoined. The opposing pole
is the
> material "atom." [Itself, a definite and fixed, 'personal' focus
of energy.]
>
>
>
> 3. Therefore, as the WHOLE UNIVERSE consists of
these "spiritually
> wise Monads," each is as ancient as any other (an
ancient "brotherhood" in
> fact). To each, a "material" atomic counterpart is fixed.
>
>
>
> 4. Their "WISDOM [Buddhi]," includes for final reference,
an exact
> and actual pictorial HISTORY of all events over vast periods of
both
> manifested and non-manifested TIME [manvantaras and pralayas
impacted in
> Akasa. Thereon, the 'Path" (choices made by each free-willed
independent
> Monad) that lead to the present exactitude of effects and
circumstances) of
> each Monad can be retraced.].
>
>
>
> KARMA: In this all-inclusive LAW, their (individual;
and
> collective) 'WISDOM' may also be grasped as KARMA.
>
>
>
> That implies a knowledge of all causal factors
(choices made by
> each free-willed independent Monad) that lead to the present
exactitude of
> effects and circumstances All Monads of whatever level of
experience embody
> and include these factors. There can be no concealment, evasion, or
> "influencing" any Karmic factor anywhere, or at any time -- from
the vast
> past up to now.
>
>
>
> 5. They [Monads] entirely pervade "SPACE" -- they are
SPACE, and
> have always been there and will continue to be there.
>
>
>
> 6. The Monad serves as a "connection" between the
uncountable
> continually changing "personal forms" of matter in which
INTELLIGENCE is
> refining itself by self-effort.
>
>
>
> 7. "EVOLUTION" is defined for Monads in the "human stage,"
as a
> moral struggle -- it is selfishness (of the personal emotional
inclinations)
> vs. universality (or the impersonality) that is to be rigidly
applied to all
> decisions. It is the transformation by WILL of the Kama-Manasic
into the
> Budhi-Manasic
>
>
>
> Currently, the fiery debate relative to "Intelligent Design," and,
> "Evolutionary Development" merely points to the underlying nature
of
> personal (material) INTELLIGENCE gradually (spiritually)
individualizing
> itself under the general laws of universal spiritual and
impersonal effort.
>
>
>
> Truth is no respecter of persons – let those of sluggish toes
beware. Often
> "tact" closely borders on untruth. In the long run, honesty of
speech is
> more valuable and less time-wasting.
>
>
>
> I write this after many years checking and re-checking .
>
>
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
>
>
>
>
> Dallas
>
>
>
> ==================================
>
>
>
>
>
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application