Theos-Talk Archives (September 2005 Message tt00193)

Dallas, 

Thanks for your comments below. I will reply as soon as I have some 
time to compose a coherent reply.

Daniel

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, <dalval14@e...> wrote:
> 9/9/2005 5:33 AM
> 
> Dear Daniel:
> 
> RE:	Was there actually TAMPERING with the 1884 Judge 
letter???
> 
> 
> I have not seen the original. I am not an expert in dating 
or "tampering,"
> but what have any experts said on this ? Have any been consulted ?
> 
> Does the validity of the Theosophical philosophy and its 
legitimacy hinge,
> fall or rise, based on this alone? 
> 
> It does have some significance in the sheaf of Judge Case 
documents, and I
> think Pelletier has a legitimate right in pointing to it. 
> 
> What do you think of Judge's writings taken as a body, and 
illustrative of
> an individuals' attitude and continuity of character? Place that 
in the
> balance also. 
> 
> Look at the vagueness of the "Judge Case" accusations proffered by 
Annie
> Besant -- no logic, no documents, only one's say-so, etc... Basil 
Crump made
> short work of those as a barrister. Her inconsistency and 
incoherence
> alone, defeat her. 
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Dallas
> 
> =================================================
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com [mailto:theos-
talk@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Daniel H. Caldwell
> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:18 PM
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Theos-World Jerry and Dallas: Was there actually 
TAMPERING with the
> 1884 Judge letter???
> 
> Jerry H.E. and Dallas T.,
> 
> I am curious to know if either one of you believe
> that there was actually tampering with the 1884
> Judge letter as Ernest Pelletier contends in his book
> THE JUDGE CASE?
> 
> See:
> 
> http://theos-talk.com/archives/200501/tt00022.html
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/28180
> 
> http://theos-talk.com/archives/200501/tt00025.html
> 
> http://free.hostdepartment.com/r/reneewilliamss/comparison.htm
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/20871
> 
> I can't see how the alleged tampering was accomplished
> in LIGHT of the above reproductions that I have
> provided.
> 
> Ernest Pelletier was apparently not interested enough
> to write to me and throw any additional light on the
> matter.
> 
> What do the two of you think?
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links