Theos-Talk Archives (January 2005 Message tt00022)

In the Jan. 2005 issue of LUCIFER,
Ernest Pelletier wrote the following
about his book THE JUDGE CASE:

------------------------------------------
One of the most important points of the book 
is the publication, for the first time ever, 
of Judge's September 17th, 1884 letter to 
Judge Khandalavala. This is the document 
that Adyar has gone out of its way to keep 
from public scrutiny, and used subversively 
to sustain the questioning of Judge's 
veracity. I have it on good authority that 
it is shown only to select individuals to 
"prove" that Judge was supposedly a fraud, 
while at the same time claiming that they 
are in fact "protecting" his reputation 
from being further damaged. The involvement 
of Judge N.D. Khandalavala in setting up 
this whole scenario back in 1892-1893, and 
its perpetuation to date as described above, 
I consider pivotal to the currently existing 
downplay/rejection of Judge and his contribution 
to the Theosophical Movement.
---------------------------------------------- 
Quoted from:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lucifer7/message/18

I am planning to pursue an online investigation
and discussion [hopefully in part on Theos-Talk]
of this claim of tampering with
W.Q. Judge's Sept. 17, 1884 Letter to N.D. Khandalavala.

I have produced various reproductions of the letter
in question which can be found on the WWW at:

http://blavatskyarchives.com/wqj/1.htm

I am hoping some readers will contribute their
own comments here at Theos-Talk.

More in the near future.

Daniel H. Caldwell
BLAVATSKY STUDY CENTER
http://hpb.cc