Theos-Talk Archives (January 2005 Message tt00564)

Friend
But can Buddhi , the vehicle of pure universal spirit, have lower aspects?... for it is the vehicle of Atma!
Krishtar

----- Original Message ----- 
From: M. Sufilight 
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: criticism within TS-Adyar_Krishtar



I will answer - Yes - to your second question. That is Both options - and I 
would say both his buddhi and kama-manas when being in their negative 
aspects.


M. Sufilight

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "krishtar" <krishtar_a@brturbo.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: criticism within TS-Adyar_Krishtar



Friend Morten

What did you mean with the expression " Shadow " on ...."which beginners 
read and when they do - they because of that
connects their minds with the authors mind (including his shadow), ?
Do you mean that CWL´s records printed the akasha or his kamarûpa?
Yes because his mind ( the lower manas) may still be linked with it in the 
kamaloka, unless the masters have already destroyed it.

Krishtar

----- Original Message ----- 
From: M. Sufilight
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: criticism within TS-Adyar




Hallo Bart and all,

My views:

On Steiner I would definitely say no, although he had some influence.
Bailey was not really an influential member when she got thrown out was 
she?

Bart wrote:
There is nobody in the Theosophical Society today who has a position
that even remotely compares to the position that Leadbeater had.

My answer:
Perhaps. But, How do you know? -
One sign against this view is, that They havn't aborted promoting his 
books
in TS. Books, which beginners read and when they do - they because of that
connects their minds with the authors mind (including his shadow), and
sometimes the authors mind at the time he wrote the book they read.
It also depends on, what kind of position you are talking about.


from
M. Sufilight with peace and love...


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bart Lidofsky" <bartl@sprynet.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: criticism within TS-Adyar


>
> M. Sufilight wrote:
>> I think CWL has been the most influential theosophist, who ever have 
got
>> "thrown out" of the TS in all of the TS history - and this is worth
>> considering.
>
> How about Steiner and Bailey?
>
>> Has anyone ever personally contacted "high-ranking" TS Adyar or any 
other
>> Theosophical branch or offshoot about their official position as of 
TODAY
>> on
>> CWL's sex-activities as mentioned in the following link and elsewhere
>> ???:
>> http://blavatskyarchives.com/ton2.pdf
>
> There is nobody in the Theosophical Society today who has a position
> that even remotely compares to the position that Leadbeater had.
>
> Bart
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




Yahoo! Groups Links









[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Links










   
Yahoo! Groups Links



   





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]