Theos-Talk Archives (March 2004 Message tt00234)

Steve,
I'm not sure if you are joking, but there seems to be alot of errors 
in what you are saying. Blavatsky was not a racist. She criticises 
Christianity a lot more than she criticises the Jews. The Chinese and 
the Indians are not the root races that are dying out, it is the 
Australian aborigines. The TS never promoted the protocols. And the 
Swastika was used by the TS long before there was ever such a thing 
as Nazi's. Have I left anything out? 

By the way, what do you think is her racial theory? I thought you 
were already a student of Theosophy. Perhaps I was wrong.

A^A^



> Ny views are:
> 
> Much as I wish it were not so, Blavatsky was a racist plain and 
> simple and an antiSemite. Name a single Jew who was allowed into 
her 
> inner circle. The Theosophical Society was instrumental in 
promoting 
> the infamous PROTOCOLS and other racist propaganda. They even use 
> the swastila sas their symbol to this day and laugh with glese 
every 
> time they point to it. What is funny about using a symbol of hate 
> for a sumbol and why are Theosophists always pointing at it and 
> smiling and laughing? My views are also that her views on this 
> matter are totally unscientific, since there is no reason to 
believe 
> the Chinese and Indians, both representatices of "earlier" "races" 
> according to her thinking, are dying out. Her racial theory is 
> interesting but it does not hold up to scrutiny.