Theos-Talk Archives (June 2003 Message tt00181)

Hi Morten,

First you write that something is THE true theosophists contention... 
and even TRADITIONALLY there was a clear-cut method. Which rather 
makes you claim something extraordinary. Now Blavatsky tried to 
support her (for her time) rather extraordinary claims with quotes 
from every place she could find. How about you? Why should we take 
seriously what you say? How can you support what you say with some 
sort of evidence? And while we are at it... You claim there was a 
clear-cut method. This raises our expectations obviously. If you 
haven't just thought the below up, you must know that method. Can we 
hear it? It might make us able to judge whether or not you are right 
in your other contentions. (though personally I firmly believe that 
with every person there is a different path. This was written in The 
Voice of the Silence and Krishnamurti says just about the same thing 
in saying time and time again that no single method will lead to the 
truth.)

Katinka
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-
> > : :"The true Theosophists contention is that, traditionally,
> > there was a clear-cut
> > method, widely if not universally applied by 'those who know'."