Theos-Talk Archives (January 2003 Message tt00496)

DHCibc> "Blavatsky and Bailey on the Christ: COMPARE & CONTRAST"
DHCibc> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/10619

Both HPB and AAB are in accord on the inner meaning of "Christ," and
there are numerous passages in AAB that shows this close agreement. It
is this inner quality that most interests me.

I have no problem with the reasonableness of Bailey's inclusion of the
a physical manifestation which HPB denied.

In my view, sometimes Bailey spoke as Bailey, and sometimes Blavatsky
spoke as Blavatsky. I do not read them as bibles. I understand HPB's
reaction to the superficial.


Best Light,

James