Theos-Talk Archives (December 2002 Message tt00320)

Frank:
In other words: The ULT'ers are unbrotherly, because they don't want
have to do anything with the trained chelas of the Masters of
Compassion, at least in their role as occult successors of the O.H.
from 1875-91. This ULT behavior seems to be unjust, unfair and
unbrotherly against HPB, too. :-)

Bart:
Well, at the New York TS (Adyar) Lodge, we often recommend that members
who want to learn Blavatsky's works in more depth pay a visit to the
local ULT, as well...

Frank:
Does that mean that The NY Adyar Lodge is on a lower level than even the
ULT?
Does Adyar know something about esoteric successors of HPB?
And how can the Adyar TS recommend ULT on HPB topics when the ULT (according
to several emails from ULT'ers in this list) does not know anything about
the esoteric side of HPB?
What does your term "depth" mean in this contect? Under in-depth study of
Theosophy I understand the occult or esoteric level. The question of occult
successors appointed by HPB:. is an esoteric or occult question. So far it
was openly denied by ULT'ers that HPB has had any successors. Far more, it
was also several times denied that co-founder of the TS and ES (the TS being
lauchned out from the ES and not vice versa as some exotericists believe)
Judge was no messenger of the Masters, although ULT founder Robert Crosbie
knew it! But beyond WQJ the ULT accepts no messenger or occult successor to
HPB as O.H.
But Bart, your comment can also be interpreted that way: The half blind is
the king under the totally blind!