Theos-Talk Archives (October 2002 Message tt00012)

HI MIc. It is good to see someone pondering scientific material in a way
that is creative and trying to find correlations and applications to the
larger world as one knows it and to oneself in ones daily life. I am
untrained in science, but I used to be a science nut and for a few years I
loved to ponder quantum concepts, especially new inventions and discoveries
I read about in science magazines. What I tried to do was apply these
principles to my own physical body in relationship to the larger universe.

Sometimes there was an insight, sometimes not, but it was fun and
interesting and helped me to think differently about subtle materials and
their interactions. I was born with synesthia, and different qualities of
very subtle refinements of material are physically recognizable to me. I
sort of "see" them with an inner eye, but this seems to be a real
measurement of very real material, not just imagination. One thing I have
discovered is that everything refers back to an interaction between the
physical body with its shape-organization and incoming materials of light,
air and physical food, which enter the body and are there interchanged with
other materials and transmuted.

I have often thought about the subject of light, and I believe the
organization of the human brain has evolved to reflect the way light
manifests itself to us; in the right brain material is assimilated in crude
whole bites ( waves ), and in the left brain, by chewing things up into
little pieces ( points.) The thing I invariably miss when I try to
understand this is myself as a MOVING object, because "I" am so lost in
trying to figure this or anything out that there is nothing left to record
or trace the movement of doing so. I believe that when a conscious tracing
of ones own movement is complete and continuous, incoming material
(impressions) is affected so that the brain naturally reorganizes points
into sets or planes in such a way that material is not oversimplified (as it
would be when taken in as a crude bite that misses subtleties or into a
stereotype and subsequent reaction, for example, that is perhaps triggered
at a "point" where adrenaline is released, but can be handled and
rearranged in large blocks or sets, which contributes to a wave like state
in which the brain works differently. This probably has something to do with
the pineal gland and also the use of areas of the brain that are usually
inaccessible. When I am not fully conscious, but am trying to look back and
analyze material, there is not enough energy left over to record the shifts
between modes. Maybe doing this would be what Krishnamurti referred to as
living with death in futureless silence. I believe that when the shifts are
consciously recorded, the brain becomes more intelligent, as it can
reorganize itself and integrate material in a mode that was previously
unavailable. Perhaps this is akin to masonry or entering a fourth
dimension. Sincerely, Wry


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mic Forster" <micforster@yahoo.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World waves and periods


> Alright, now to bring it all together and weed out any
> ambiguities.
>
> So we have light which when studied as a particle
> behaves as a particle and when studied as a wave
> behaves as a wave. (I should here mention that I have
> no education in physics, just ecology/biology, so
> excuse any ignorance that arises.) This is quantum
> physics particle/wave duality. Now in ecology I have
> seen many many papers which have shown graphs that
> clearly represent waves. The classic predator/prey
> cycles that you mave have come across is an excellent
> example. Apart from a side mention by the author of
> terms relating to waves as far as I know no ecologists
> has ever said that what we are looking at is another
> example of the particle/wave duality. Perhaps because,
> until recently, such a duality was only thought to
> exist on a subatomic level. Is all this making sense
> so far?
>
> Here is where I have becomed muddled. When we talk
> about the particle/wave duality does this duality
> exist on any level and in regards to any phenomenon
> that we want it to exist with? What I am trying to get
> at is this: when we see data that gives a graph like
> the classic predator/prey cycle can we say that at
> once it is both a particle and a wave? Or, another
> example: when we see fluctuations in the stock market
> can we say that it is at once both a particle and a
> wave?
>
> Thank you for your help anyone that responds to this.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>