[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Oct 01, 2002 07:19 PM
by Mic Forster
Alright, now to bring it all together and weed out any ambiguities. So we have light which when studied as a particle behaves as a particle and when studied as a wave behaves as a wave. (I should here mention that I have no education in physics, just ecology/biology, so excuse any ignorance that arises.) This is quantum physics particle/wave duality. Now in ecology I have seen many many papers which have shown graphs that clearly represent waves. The classic predator/prey cycles that you mave have come across is an excellent example. Apart from a side mention by the author of terms relating to waves as far as I know no ecologists has ever said that what we are looking at is another example of the particle/wave duality. Perhaps because, until recently, such a duality was only thought to exist on a subatomic level. Is all this making sense so far? Here is where I have becomed muddled. When we talk about the particle/wave duality does this duality exist on any level and in regards to any phenomenon that we want it to exist with? What I am trying to get at is this: when we see data that gives a graph like the classic predator/prey cycle can we say that at once it is both a particle and a wave? Or, another example: when we see fluctuations in the stock market can we say that it is at once both a particle and a wave? Thank you for your help anyone that responds to this. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com