Ademm Indraka wrote:
I find that forms of abstract information can relate the true idea
that a writer introduces. Those that haven't the mind for abstract
dialogue and or esoteric idealism probably will not get the concept
that is being portrayed.
In other words, you are saying those who have difficulty understanding
your obfuscations are stupid? Or are you trying to bypass the critical
facility, creating writings designed to appeal to our 4th root race
selves, similarly to, say, the hypnotic techniques of Dr. Milton
Erickson?
In general the work that oraganon incorporates has been
specifically designed
to strike cognitive activity in some form or another.
I looked up the word "oraganon", but could not find a relevant
definition. Can you explain what that term means?
Bart Lidofsky
By no means an I saying that those that do not understand the work
are "stupid" I try not to classify class or define individuals
through judgment. In some form or another I suppose that I do find
retaliation in and out of the fourth root race. Indirectly my studies
have been influenced by pre or co existing to that of the old
kingdom. Limited not excluding the Atlanteans and faithfully
expressed in India Chaldean Egyptian, through deity representation
and philosophical thought. And I suppose in all honesty my writing in
general has been influenced by original direct translations, which
are a bit enigmatic if not edited to straight structure. The
potential of Dr. Milton seam to be sound in a sense to conformity of
sub conscious idealism. One may circum to a understanding otherwise
not known unless it was introduced through the arranged structure of
wording or motion in general.