Theos-Talk Archives (April 2002 Message tt00280)

At 01:46 PM 4/23/02 -0400, you wrote:

> Ademm Indraka wrote:
> > I find that forms of abstract information can relate the true idea
> > that a writer introduces. Those that haven't the mind for abstract
> > dialogue and or esoteric idealism probably will not get the concept
> > that is being portrayed.
>
> In other words, you are saying those who have difficulty 
> understanding
> your obfuscations are stupid? Or are you trying to bypass the critical
> facility, creating writings designed to appeal to our 4th root race
> selves, similarly to, say, the hypnotic techniques of Dr. Milton
> Erickson?
>
> > In general the work that oraganon incorporates has been specifically 
> designed
> > to strike cognitive activity in some form or another.
>
> I looked up the word "oraganon", but could not find a relevant
> definition. Can you explain what that term means?
>
> Bart Lidofsky
Bart:

I suspect a misspelling here. I found a similar word defined
at dictionary.com.

> According to Webster's Dictionary:
>
> organon
>
> \Or"ga*non\, Organum \Or"ga*num\, n. [NL. organon, L. organum.
> See Organ.] An organ or instrument; hence, a method by which
> philosophical or scientific investigation may be conducted;
> -- a term adopted from the Aristotelian writers by Lord Bacon,
> as the title (``Novum Organon'') of part of his treatise on
> philosophical method. --Sir. W. Hamilton.
-- Eldon