Theos-Talk Archives (April 2000 Message tt00107)

One portion of my post to which you do not refer
is, perhaps, worthy of repitition:

"If you wish to know Us, study our Philosophy;
if you wish to serve Us, serve our Humanity."

Where are the 'personalities' in this statement
from one of the Masters?











On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 20:24:17 +0200, you wrote:

>
>
>[Barrett W. Culmback:]
>
>1.  this matter of historical Theosophical 'personalities,'
> 'chosen' or otherwise, is a side-issue.
>
>[Frank Reitemeyer:]
>Nothing could be more wrong like that. The teacher cannot and must not
>separated from the teachings. Both are a unity. The Masters worked always
>with individuals, never with organizations.
>I have never met a Theosophist who was an expert in the tenets and teachings
>(Technical theosophy) and has had no or little knowledge about the
>personalities of our messengers.
>In turn I have met many Theosophists who were very familiar who Blavatsky,
>Judge, Tingley, de Purucker were, what their aims and duties were and those
>fellow students has had enlightening insights in the depths of the esoteric
>philosophy.
>Everyone who says: Look at the teachings, but forget the personalities, is
>from the dark side.
>
>Frank
>
>
>
>-- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com
>
>Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and
>teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of
>"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.


-- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com

Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and
teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.