[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Apr 25, 2000 09:28 AM
by Frank Reitemeyer
I take your question serious - I see no contradiction to that what I wrote before, i.e. that the messenger cannot be separated from the message. In the quote you give that occult rule is included, although not expressly worded (note that the receiver of the Mahatma letter, Mr A.P. Sinnett, was unfit to become a lay-chela - even for the said reason - he didn't accept the messenger of the Masters -- same with HSO). > "If you wish to know Us, study our Philosophy; "Study our Philosophy". What do you think is meant here? Reading books? Force the brain with dead letter knowledge? Note that in the time, when the Mahatma letters were written, in the early 1880'ies, nearly no one theosophical book was on market, which unveiled the main tenets. Note further, that the philosophy of the Masters, which their direct messengers Helena Blavatsky, William Judge, Katherine Tingley and Gottfried de Purucker brought to the Western people, never was, never will and never can be printed in a public book. All books you can buy are exoteric, not esoteric. You can find the Masters philosophy, the sublime Esoteric Chaldeo-Tibetan-Aryan doctrine, only if you live the theosophical life, not otherwise. If you do that, you will know who and were the Masters are, who and were their messengers are and what their message/philosophy is - and that is a UNIT, you cannot grasp the one without the other. That is what is behind the quote you gave. To know the Masters, you must first learn who and where their agents are. The level of the Masters is not the one which ordinary people should wish. For us "normal" humans the right level are the messengers. If you reject the messenger, you reject the message and the Masters too. Since the ULT rejected the messenger of the Masters, who worked esoterically close with Judge in his last years, they have also rejected the Masters. Same for the students of ULT who believe that under Judge around 1890 (the appearance of the new successor) the link was broken and no messenger followed him. Those students who belief in that very wrong and harmful maintain exclude themselves psycho-magnetically from the ring of the Movement, although they may in the outer world regarded as friendly and learned people - but with this ring-pass-not one is limited to dead-letter bookish interpretations, nothing more. So much, so bad. Hope this helps. Frank > One portion of my post to which you do not refer > is, perhaps, worthy of repitition: > > "If you wish to know Us, study our Philosophy; > if you wish to serve Us, serve our Humanity." > > Where are the 'personalities' in this statement > from one of the Masters? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 20:24:17 +0200, you wrote: > > > > > > >[Barrett W. Culmback:] > > > >1. this matter of historical Theosophical 'personalities,' > > 'chosen' or otherwise, is a side-issue. > > > >[Frank Reitemeyer:] > >Nothing could be more wrong like that. The teacher cannot and must not > >separated from the teachings. Both are a unity. The Masters worked always > >with individuals, never with organizations. > >I have never met a Theosophist who was an expert in the tenets and teachings > >(Technical theosophy) and has had no or little knowledge about the > >personalities of our messengers. > >In turn I have met many Theosophists who were very familiar who Blavatsky, > >Judge, Tingley, de Purucker were, what their aims and duties were and those > >fellow students has had enlightening insights in the depths of the esoteric > >philosophy. > >Everyone who says: Look at the teachings, but forget the personalities, is > >from the dark side. > > > >Frank > > > > > > > >-- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com > > > >Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and > >teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of > >"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com. > > > -- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com > > Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and > teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of > "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com. -- THEOSOPHY WORLD -- Theosophical Talk -- theos-talk@theosophy.com Letters to the Editor, and discussion of theosophical ideas and teachings. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a message consisting of "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to theos-talk-request@theosophy.com.