Re: theos-talk DK and Bailey
Oct 20, 2011 03:48 AM
by M. Sufilight
Dear Michael and friends
My views are:
Michael wrote:
"It is my understanding that AAB started out as a sponsored messenger of DK, but quite quickly lost true contact.
Her writings from that point are very dry, and do not have the true fire of Hierarchy.
She claimed she was still speaking in the name of DK, but I do not believe this is accurate."
M. Sufilight says:
Have you read all the Alice A. Bailey books?
The above by you I will agree upon. I do not however think she ever had a true or close contact, because of the number of faults in the books - and for instance the lack of irrefutable proof of Gutpa-Vidya (Atma-Vidya) in the book A Treatise on Cosmic Fire. But I also think that some of the content in the books are promoting altruism - no doubt can be said about this, I think. About the Dark brotherhood thing - I will however throw a yes and no answer to. I think it all depends on how one interpret her books and use them. The overall view I have is that the content of the AAB books and Lucis Trust all in all are highly problematic and show clear signs on misleading people into pseudo-Christianized emotionalism without showing an understanding of the difference between sectarian and non-sectarian teachings, and the psychological term subtle Mind Control.
About Prayer
A Buddhists was once asked whether he prayed. His answer was: To whom should I pray? All is Maya and illusion. There is only Absolute Negation. Absolute Negation is Absolute Negation of the following four extremes: (1) an affirmation of true existence, (2) a negation of true existence, (3) from the point of view of superficial truth, an affirmation of true existence and from the point of view of deepest truth, a negation of true existence, or (4) neither an affirmation nor a negation of true existence.--- And even a Absolute Negation of this Absolute Negation. This is esoteric Gelugpa Rang-Tong teachings. Even thoughts are illusorical and misleading.
An Adwaita Vedantin was asked the same. His answer was: To whom am I to pray? I do not, for I am myself Parabrahm. All is Maya and Illusion. There is only Parabrahm as Neti, Neti (Not, this, nor that). And Parabrahm is within the Self of the individual. This Self which all ignorant humans have a false view upon.
See also: PARABRAHM, DEFINED BY VEDANTINS
"So true is the claim that there is no difference whatever between esoteric Buddhism and those Vedantins who understand the correct meaning of Sankaracharya's teachings-the advanced Advaitees"
http://www.katinkahesselink.net/blavatsky/articles/v4/y1883_055.htm
The questions are: What is neither some-thing, nor no-thing? What is neither existence nor non-existence, and "beyond" "this"? What is neither thought nor non-thought? What is neither time nor non-time? What is neither space nor non-space?
This is what aught to be contemplate in Absolute Negation.
M. Sufilight
----- Original Message -----
From: libertyson11
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 7:54 PM
Subject: theos-talk DK and Bailey
It is my understanding that AAB started out as a sponsored messenger of DK, but quite quickly lost true contact.
Her writings from that point are very dry, and do not have the true fire of Hierarchy.
She claimed she was still speaking in the name of DK, but I do not believe this is accurate. Here writings have been used by the false, dark brotherhood as a gathering point of the world socialist/bankster power mongers to support their one world tyranny.
I pray to Hierarchy to guide all spirits away from this false path to what is Right for each one.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: theos-talk DK and Bailey
- From: Tom Robertson <007@EzbVXL2uioLj3MtnGpNowlD1aElYd8iesx5HKOR0juGs3ZxIJtbfX0AJn3GicNdjWEDnCWly3_YiLlvH.yahoo.invalid>
- References:
- DK and Bailey
- From: "libertyson11" <libertyson11@klCctTGm38bw_k5DrELtwRbYZ7Vv2Uu15DBedRrH2irY7gnwyUkhrND6ZCbX20GJZ8VG3jFWkCkbU3V3-wbN.yahoo.invalid>
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application