Theos-Talk Archives (July 2009 Message tt00288)

Dear Mkr and all

Further to my last post please find the following addresses 
which may be of interest.

1) A website hosted by Anton Rozman comprising a compilation 
of documents and statements entitled, "Pages dedicated to the documents, comments and views regarding the actual situation 
in the Theosophical Society and regarding its future."
http://www.teozofija.info/tsmembers/tsindex.htm

2) Betty Bland's original "Draft Proposed Amendment."
Note the words "Draft" and "Proposed" and that it is in accord with, "...the provisions of international rules 5 and 49." 
<http://www.teozofija.info/tsmembers/RulesChanges_BlandLetter_E.htm>

3) Your (Mkr) letter in response to Mrs Bland's draft proposal.
You date this 24.9.2009. If this is correct, this is 3 months prior to the actual meeting to discuss the draft proposal.
<http://www.teozofija.info/tsmembers/RulesChanges_MKRamadossLetter.htm>   

If something is proposed 3 three months prior to the meeting of deliberation, and is in accordance with the international rules, how is this such a heinous act?

Regards
Nigel




--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, MKR <mkr777@...> wrote:
>
> Let us get all the facts out. Nobody need to fear Truth and let the chips
> fall where they may.
> 
> The ultra secret attempt to take over the appointment of the president by a
> small group of general council members by disenfranchising all the members
> worldwide is based on the facts everyone has seen. If anyone has any
> information contradicting the facts, let them post it here for all of us get
> educated.
> 
> MKR
> 
> 
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 8:11 PM, nhcareyta <nhcareyta@...> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Dear Preethi and all
> >
> > It now appears from your comments that there was much more to
> > the attempt to offer another President for the Adyar Theosophical
> > Society at the last international convention.
> >
> > And it is certainly becoming apparent that the so called "ultra secret
> > attempt" idea, promulgated repeatedly by Doss (Mkr), may
> > not have been so after all.
> >
> > Inferring from what you expose, and from what others have
> > written, the procedure for presenting an alternative voting system
> > for international president was both in accord with the rules and
> > in the interests of fair play, but may have been politically manipulated by
> > those in Adyar to appear differently?
> >
> > Do you have any direct knowledge of this process as it unfolded
> > at Adyar?
> >
> > And can you cast any light as to why Mary Anderson nominated
> > John Algeo for president, after having worked closely with Radha
> > Burnier at Adyar for so many years?
> >
> > You are presenting us with a system that appears prima facie
> > rotten to the core, exposing favouritism, nepotism and political
> > machinations of the worst kind. I am sure genuine seekers after
> > truth appreciate your candid expose and trust others will acknowledge your
> > facts with impartiality rather than blind fanaticism.
> >
> > Regards
> > Nigel
> >
> > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com <theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > "seeker_preethi" <seeker_preethi@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Mrs Burnier,
> > >
> > > Trust you have started to feel regret, remorse and all those
> > growth-oriented feelings. Some things i forgot to mention in my last email
> > [No subject] to you:
> > >
> > > Did you see the latest issue of Wake Up India? The contents page has a
> > big blunder on it. Your name is mentioned for the Editorial Article while
> > the article was written by Mr Surendra Narayan. Of course, the article has
> > his name on it as does the 'About the Author' section, but how could your
> > Editor, Dr Geetha Jaikumar miss such an obvious error? I now know why Dr A.
> > Kannan thought that i had written irrelevant things in my initial emails to
> > you.
> > >
> > > Actually, do you know there are common definitions for everything you do?
> > For example:
> > >
> > > Putting your name on someone else's hard work is called Plagiarism.
> > Geetha Jaikumar and Subha Nilakanta have been putting their name on
> > Preethi's hard work. Of course, you endorse their plagiarism, don't you?
> > >
> > > Threatening people with imprisonment so that they will not speak the
> > truth and be dishonest is called Hooliganism or in Hindi, Goondagardi. That
> > is the usual language spoken by Mr S. Harihara Raghavan, General Manager,
> > TS.
> > >
> > > Using fear to rule people is called Dictatorship. That is the behaviour
> > you follow with Federation Secretaries, General Secretaries worldwide.
> > >
> > > Following one rule for Pedro Oliveira, one for Uma Nilakanta, and one for
> > everyone else is called favouritism.
> > >
> > > And in the July 2009 issue of the Theosophist you have also lied openly
> > Mrs Burnier. In Theosophical Work around the World, you mention that Mrs
> > Linda Oliveira attended the 2008 Convention as international Vice-President.
> > That is a lie, Mrs Burnier, because Mrs Oliveira did not attend the 2008
> > international Convention. She was admitted in Isabelle Hospital along with
> > her husband, Mr Pedro Oliveira with a bad case of Chikungunia during the
> > entire period of the international Convention. They did not get back from
> > hospital till 5 January 2009, much after the Convention period is over.
> > Remember, Mrs Burnier, your pets Pedro and Linda did not even get to address
> > the convention gathering, even though their speeches were ready and waiting
> > at the Editorial Office.
> > >
> > > In fact, when you illegally appointed Mrs Linda Oliveira early in
> > November 2008 as IVP, the machines at the Editorial Office put up a strong
> > fight. The Nova Sheet printer converted itself into a house for thousands of
> > ants. It was an issue filled with breaks, gaps, problems and obstacles of
> > every kind.
> > >
> > > And now see how, Mrs Burnier, "Theosophists" can no longer have the
> > privilege of having their bodies exhumed on campus of Adyar. Dr Agarwal had
> > his final rites not on campus at Adyar, as past deceased Theosophists have
> > had, but outside the campus at Besant Nagar Electrical Crematorium, and C.
> > Malathi's father at Thiruvanmiyur Electrical Crematorium.
> > >
> > > Why i am bringing all of this to your and other members' attention is
> > because you can kick out Preethi from her home Adyar, but you cannot fight
> > the Forces of Adyar, the Forces of Nature and the Force of Life, who are all
> > stronger than you or all your cronies put together will ever be.
> > >
> > > It is time for you to step down from your post Mrs Burnier and to allow
> > younger blood and younger generations to lead the TS, someone more spiritual
> > than you are; someone more Theosophical, united than you are.
> > >
> > > I was shocked to read your Watch-Tower Notes in the July 2009 issue of
> > the Theosophist, where you stress so much on Brahminism as being the
> > criterion for a person to be accepted as a chela. So finally in your
> > declining years, shall we say you have come back to your element and now are
> > intending to practise casteism in the form of offering chelaship to brahmins
> > by birth? And who would be your most preferred candidate -- Subha Nilakanta
> > or Harihara Raghavan?
> > >
> > > This is, indeed, shocking from someone who claims to be a 3rd-generation
> > Theosophist. Shocking not only because of the casteist-flavour of your
> > statements in the Theosophist, but also because one would expect that the
> > head of the EST would know that chelaship or being a vehicle for the Masters
> > of the Wisdom has got nothing to do with birth but more to do with the
> > quality of the soul.
> > >
> > > Recipients to this email/message, welcome to the Brahminical Society of
> > Mrs Radha Burnier, who fraudulently addresses herself as the President of
> > the Theosophical Society.
> > >
> > > Preethi
> > >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>