Theos-Talk Archives (June 2009 Message tt00588)

The source of the info has been identified in the msg. Referring to info
from other sources is very common. The key issue is not disclosure, (which
is done all the time by journalists) but doctored document.
.
This along with the issue of people hiding under pseudonyms to avoid
personal responsibility for what they say in cyberspace, are also being
discussed in the theosophical community at theosophy.net. Everyone can
visit that site and see for themselves.
.
MKR
.
There is no religion higher than Truth
.


On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 6:17 AM, robertapimenta26 <
robertapimenta26@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
> Dirty Trick? Dirty is too good a word for this trick!! Wished I had more
> time to write now, but I could see that the thread has been taken from that
> (TSA) site already. Just as with the 'leaking' of the draft proposal last
> year, this is a mean and deliberate attempt to discredit certain people. It
> won't work this time!
> Must go.
> Roberta
>
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com <theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com>, MKR
> <mkr777@...> wrote:
> >
> > In the theosophical.ning, a purported "ES" document was posted by one
> Mary
> > Underwood ( which is likely to be a pseudonym, until it is proven
> otherwise)
> > and there was a response to it, which is self-explanatory? One wonders if
> > some "dirty tricks" department is working to bring down whom? You decide
> for
> > yourself.
> > .
> > First we had allegations of sickness of Radha Burnier, now we have this
> > attempt. What next? Those who have the best interests of TS and theosophy
> in
> > their hearts should be very vigilant in this age of Kali Yuga!
> > .
> > MKR
> > .
> > ===xxx===
> > Mary,
> >
> > This only shows either your dishonesty or that of the one that gave you
> the
> > information. The text HAS BEEN ADULTERED because, among other things,
> Radha
> > Burnier never mentions the TS in her letter. Somebody purposefully added
> > that part to generate confusion.
> > One requisite to be an ES member is to have confidence in the ES head in
> > his/her function as ES head. This is clearly stated in papers since HPB's
> > times. The current ES head is doing what she has the right (and probably
> the
> > duty) to do.
> > But everybody can see through your action how members are manipulated by
> > people who misinform and twist the truth for personal reasons.
> > There are many examples of things like this happening in the past; and
> then,
> > people say this is the ES fault. In most cases the problems have been
> > produced by TS members who were not even up to the TS ideals.
> > Thank you for providing such a clear example.
> > ===xxx==
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]