Theos-Talk Archives (June 2009 Message tt00258)

Hi MKR,

"The Indian Section challenged the allegations. These allegations made the
membership in the Indian Section both sad and felt deeply hurt. This, will
make it difficult for a long time for anyone from the West to be elected as
the president, because of the overwhelming number of members in the Indian
Section." -- your quote below.

Are you predicting the results of the next election? We are talking about the next one in seven years, aren't we? Seven years is a long time to forget and forgive grouses, don't you think?

Preethi



--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, MKR <mkr777@...> wrote:
>
> Allegations about election procedure in Indian Section
> .
> Soon after the election result was announced declaring the election of Radha
> Burnier, when everyone expected that now that the election is over and there
> would be unity within the leadership around the world so that TS can get on
> with its mission, everyone was in for a surprise. Some well known leaders on
> the losing camp, alleged that there were procedural problems in the voting
> and reporting in the Indian Section. These allegations were not
> substantiated and were untrue as later disclosures showed.
> .
> The Indian Section challenged the allegations. These allegations made the
> membership in the Indian Section both sad and felt deeply hurt. This, will
> make it difficult for a long time for anyone from the West to be elected as
> the president, because of the overwhelming number of members in the Indian
> Section.
> .
> Indian Section has the largest membership and is growing while the
> membership outside India is either stagnant or going down. All past
> presidents were fully aware of the need for full support from the hearts of
> the membership in India for anyone who wants to lead. TS is a fully
> autonomous organization and hence leaders cannot act like the leaders in
> commercial organizations. They need support from the hearts of members.
> .
> The only retraction of the allegation I have seen so far is a statement by
> Betty Bland on a little known Internet website. She stated:
> .
> '' .. I unknowingly misstated some dates in my most recent report about the
> 2008 Adyar Convention (â??Report from Adyar,â?? Quest, spring 2009). There were
> two deadlines for the 2008 election results to be turned in to the
> International Secretary. The first date, June 6, was the time by which all
> sections should have their votes in or they would be further solicited; the
> second date was the absolute deadline of June 28. A two-week extension, to
> July 12, was granted to the Indian Section, but they did not use it.''
> .
> The above raises some points. On matters of details, every reporter knows
> that they verify them from two independent sources. Then, before publishing
> them, they contact the target and ask for their comments. These are done to
> make sure the facts are accurate, because the credibility of the reporter is
> involved. These days, it is very easy and cheap to pick up a phone and make
> an international call. On important matters, every businessman/woman knows,
> telephone works best. In addition, while Betty was in Adyar for the
> convention and GC meeting, she could have personally asked the head of the
> Indian Section and the International Secretary about the allegation. If
> these had been done, the matter could have been put at rest months ago.
> .
> Also on a serious allegation such as the above, when entire membership is
> affected, quick clear cut public apology is what is expected and works.
> Publishing a statement quoted above in a little known website does not help,
> IMHO.
> .
> Now it is upto each member to make a call.
> .
> MKR
> .
> For more on theosophy go to: theosophy.net
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>