Theos-Talk Archives (February 2009 Message tt00391)

The main reason why Blavatsky was ridiculed for her writing is her
writing lacks consistency. A person with good level of intellect and
has read considerably, even if he does not have clairvoyant faculties,
can notice the discrepancies and contradictions in her writing.
Blavatsky's writing and so called Mahatma Letters contain such
discrepancies and contradictions that people don't think these
writings are reliable. Discrepancies and contradictions come in
writing when person's clairvoyant faculties are not developed to high
level of accuracy. Discrepancies and contradictions being
characteristic features of Blavatsky's writing and Mahatma Letters
produced by her, one will have to conclude that Blavatsky's
clairvoyant was not accurate and reliable.


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Anand" <AnandGholap@...> wrote:
>
> I think most satisfactory, though not complete, explanation of what
> Blavatsky was is given by Subba Rao-Leadbeater theory. I hope more
> research will be done on that topic. 
> 
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Anand" <AnandGholap@> wrote:
> >
> >   
> > >   " [Blavatsky's housekeeper, Emma Cutting, demonstrated] how
she and
> > > HPB had made a doll together, which they ... manipulated on a long
> > > bamboo pole in semi-darkness to provide the Master's alleged
> > > apparitions. Emma had also dropped "precipitated" letters on to
> > > Theosophical heads from holes in the ceiling...
> > 
> > We can see how talented our founder was.
> >
>