Theos-Talk Archives (February 2009 Message tt00395)

Dear Anand

Anand wrote:
"Discrepancies and contradictions come in
writing when person's clairvoyant faculties are not developed to high
level of accuracy."


My M. Sufilight comment:
Any honest Seeker after Truth I will clearly have to disagree about this statement.


Instead we aught to say:
What is perceived as "Discrepancies and contradictions come in
writing" when we are dealing with metaphysics and esoterical issues.
And these are sometimes confused as being an evidence on a lack of clairvoyant faculties.

To you ever imagine a Master never will throw you a white lie or create what to some appears to be mistakes, if he or she better would be able to help humanity along?
Do you imagine, that all the writings from the Masters, H. P. Blavatsky and even H. S. Olcott always was written without an eye on the impact their words would have compared with their dead-letter truth?

People often like to think for themselves, that they are wise and cleaver, and even INFALLIBLE. Yet they are not. Those of us, who are on a level of consciousness higher than Devachan do know, what is planned for each human incarnation on this earth. Saying the opposite, we will have to disagree upon. Try for instance to read the below.


Remember H. P. Blavatsky wrote in The Key to Theosophy, p. 141, 162:
"After allowing the Soul, escaped from the pangs of personal life, a sufficient, aye, a hundredfold compensation, Karma, with its army of Skandhas, waits at the threshold of Devachan, whence the Ego re-emerges to assume a new incarnation. It is at this moment that the future destiny of the now-rested Ego trembles in the scales of just Retribution, as it now falls once again under the sway of active Karmic law. It is in this rebirth which is ready for it, a rebirth selected and prepared by this mysterious, inexorable, but in the equity and wisdom of its decrees infallible LAW, that the sins of the previous life of the Ego are punished. Only it is into no imaginary Hell, with theatrical flames and ridiculous tailed and horned devils, that the Ego is cast, but verily on to this earth, the plane and region of his sins, where he will have to atone for every bad thought and deed. As he has sown, so will he reap. Reincarnation will gather around him all those other Egos who have suffered, whether directly or indirectly, at the hands, or even through the unconscious instrumentality, of the past personality. "
.......
"As the man at the moment of death has a retrospective insight into the life he has led, so, at the moment he is reborn on to earth, the Ego, awaking from the state of Devachan, has a prospective vision of the life which awaits him, and realizes all the causes that have led to it. He realizes them and sees futurity, because it is between Devachan and re-birth that the Ego regains his full manasic consciousness, and rebecomes for a short time the god he was, before, in compliance with Karmic law, he first descended into matter and incarnated in the first man of flesh. The "golden thread" sees all its "pearls" and misses not one of them. 
http://www.phx-ult-lodge.org/aKEY.htm






M. Sufilight

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Anand 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 9:50 AM
  Subject: Theos-World Re: C.W. Leadbeater, the greatest occultist-saint of all times


  The main reason why Blavatsky was ridiculed for her writing is her
  writing lacks consistency. A person with good level of intellect and
  has read considerably, even if he does not have clairvoyant faculties,
  can notice the discrepancies and contradictions in her writing.
  Blavatsky's writing and so called Mahatma Letters contain such
  discrepancies and contradictions that people don't think these
  writings are reliable. Discrepancies and contradictions come in
  writing when person's clairvoyant faculties are not developed to high
  level of accuracy. Discrepancies and contradictions being
  characteristic features of Blavatsky's writing and Mahatma Letters
  produced by her, one will have to conclude that Blavatsky's
  clairvoyant was not accurate and reliable.

  --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Anand" <AnandGholap@...> wrote:
  >
  > I think most satisfactory, though not complete, explanation of what
  > Blavatsky was is given by Subba Rao-Leadbeater theory. I hope more
  > research will be done on that topic. 
  > 
  > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Anand" <AnandGholap@> wrote:
  > >
  > > 
  > > > " [Blavatsky's housekeeper, Emma Cutting, demonstrated] how
  she and
  > > > HPB had made a doll together, which they ... manipulated on a long
  > > > bamboo pole in semi-darkness to provide the Master's alleged
  > > > apparitions. Emma had also dropped "precipitated" letters on to
  > > > Theosophical heads from holes in the ceiling...
  > > 
  > > We can see how talented our founder was.
  > >
  >


  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]