Re: Theos-World Re: Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?
Dec 17, 2008 11:20 AM
by Martin
The Path light, hmm sounds good, is that low calories?
--- On Wed, 12/17/08, christinaleestemaker <christinaleestemaker@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: christinaleestemaker <christinaleestemaker@yahoo.com>
Subject: Theos-World Re: Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2008, 6:23 PM
Yes, it is what I said.
But I have a freeze full and never ends its fresh assortment and
gives the late desires satisfaction. I don't need to eat "the light on
the path"
:-)
Christina
--- In theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com, Martin <Mvandertak@ ...> wrote:
>
> Lol Christina,
>
> Supermarkets are the place to use your brains else you get screwed
on your money,,,
>
> --- On Wed, 12/17/08, christinaleestemake r
<christinaleestemak er@...> wrote:
> From: christinaleestemake r <christinaleestemak er@...>
> Subject: Theos-World Re: Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?
> To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
> Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2008, 5:53 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Gregg,
>
> Welcome to the club.
>
>
>
> How do I see who I am.
>
> From very young my mother asked me and I said, that I am a part of
a
>
> whole, ... whomb you can call it.
>
> Of course, human,etherical, psychological and physical in nature.
>
> Not a being who has been before.
>
> While later I have had visions in consciousness( awaking state)
about
>
> some life before.Have to do with Isis, litary in Philae temple.
>
> My brain don't manage me. I am far above that.And it works most of
>
> the time.Only in supermarket I lost my brain. And money hahah!!!
>
> Why you want to know? Have some resemblances?
>
> Interested Christina.
>
>
>
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com, "F Gregg Meagher"
>
> <f.gregg.meagher@ ...> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Hi Christina!
>
> > How do you see 'You' to be?
>
> > Human and Physical in nature?
>
> > Or a 'Being' who has been, let's say dressed into a 'body'
suitable
>
> for a
>
> > journey into the physical experience?
>
> > Does your 'brain' manage you?
>
> > Or, is it a control room with an elaborated sensor system ... for
>
> you to
>
> > manage within the physical state of existence?
>
> > In brief, for 'you' > Who are you?
>
> > Thanks for your time in reading the above.
>
> > Gregg
>
> >
>
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 9:31 PM, christinaleestemake r <
>
> > christinaleestemake r@...> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > Dear All,
>
> > > If I have read all written about this subject I came to this:
>
> > > There is only one absolute reality which put out its
manifestation
>
> > > only through the pralaya state into worlds and different times
>
> and in
>
> > > different ways.All the same in multidimensional vibrations.
>
> > > So if we see on earth dark, everywere else it could be light or
>
> > > lighter, because it is light.Only question is why we see dark
>
> depends
>
> > > on the material influenze from this earth.Elsewere under
>
> influenze of
>
> > > astral,ether or subether makes only there other fews of the same
>
> > > output.
>
> > >
>
> > > How to make it difficult; Christina
>
> > >
>
> > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com <theos-talk% 40yahoogroups.
com>,
>
> Leon
>
> > > Maurer <leonmaurer@ > wrote:
>
> > > >
>
> > > > Hi Cass,
>
> > > >
>
> > > > Yes, I think we've already broken through the last barrier
>
> toward
>
> > > > fulfilling HPB's prophesy in the very near future. (Perhaps
this
>
> > > is
>
> > > > the great new change that the Mayan calendar has been telling
us
>
> > > is
>
> > > > coming around 2012... Not an end, but a beginning. ;-)
>
> > > >
>
> > > > The final proof will come when the ABC model can be
demonstrated
>
> > > as
>
> > > > fact beyond a shadow of a doubt. Already research is being
>
> > > planned
>
> > > > that will demonstrate, so everyone can see and experience it,
>
> that
>
> > > > the universe is a hologram, and what we can know of it is
>
> already
>
> > > in
>
> > > > our higher mind... Pretty much the way HPB described it (if
you
>
> > > can
>
> > > > read the SD "in and around the words and between the lines"
and
>
> > > cut
>
> > > > through all the "blinds").
>
> > > >
>
> > > > As for the previous universe and pralaya...
>
> > > >
>
> > > > All that it requires, is for the universe to continue to
expand
>
> --
>
> > > > and lose entropy -- until everything in it dissolves back
into
>
> the
>
> > > > aether or absolute space... With total metric space and its
>
> mass-
>
> > > > energy "particles" and their forms compacting into infinite
>
> zero-
>
> > > > (laya) points of spin momentum or "abstract motion" (while
still
>
> > > > containing all the information as holographic wave
interference
>
> > > > patterns)... While that aether, which in its overall nature
is
>
> like
>
> > > a
>
> > > > "Bose Einstein Condensate" (see wikipedia.com) remains ONE
>
> > > thing...
>
> > > > "Whose center, when manifest, is everywhere and circumference
>
> > > nowhere".
>
> > > >
>
> > > > That "total space" (as Einstein called it) is the cosmic
>
> > > > "singularity" that reflects itself in every potentially
>
> conscious
>
> > > > black hole at the center of every universal form -- whose
still
>
> > > > center, at absolute zero, during pralaya, is pure (sleeping)
>
> > > > potential cosmic consciousness and potential matter... Ready
to
>
> > > wake
>
> > > > up again and go through another cosmogenesis, until we all
>
> > > reappear
>
> > > > in the new cycle of life, to further evolve on a higher
plane,
>
> and
>
> > > > take up where we left off in the previous manvantara ;-) See:
>
> > > > http://www.leonmaur er.info/ABCimage s/evolution2. gif
>
> > > > Note that the fractal involved field model of cosmogenesis
>
> > > > analogously applies to the physical universe as well as all
the
>
> > > > galaxies and other forms of mass-energy, on down through our
>
> solar
>
> > > > system and planet, to the fundamental particles (spherical
>
> > > standing
>
> > > > waves) of light. See:
>
> > > > (head on cross section of a single spherically polarized
photon)
>
> > > > http://www.leonmaur er.info/ABCimage s/PhotonField. gif
>
> > > > And compare to: (cosmogenesis at the third Logos)
>
> > > > http://www.leonmaur er.info/ABCimage s/Chakrafield- spherical-
>
> col_3.jpg
>
> > > >
>
> > > > For an interesting take on this, see Feynman's talk about
light:
>
> > > > http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=FjHJ7FmV0M4
>
> > > >
>
> > > > All that -- putting together Einstein's general relativity,
>
> > > Feynman's
>
> > > > quantum electrodynamics, Bohm-Pribram' s' holographic
paradigm,
>
> > > Kaluza-
>
> > > > Klien-Greene- Witten-Kaku' s string and membrane physics --
>
> > > certainly
>
> > > > is "scientific" ... And, all of it totally consistent with
the
>
> ABC
>
> > > > model of cosmogenesis, based solely on the formulas in the
Book
>
> of
>
> > > > Dzyan, as explained by HPB.
>
> > > >
>
> > > > Then, when pralaya is over (as the modern scientific pundits
>
> > > > speculate from their mathematics) -- the infinite new
universes
>
> > > > (galaxies, solar systems, planets, bacteria, plants, animals,
>
> > > humans,
>
> > > > etc,) spring up everywhere in their time and place, like
spray
>
> in
>
> > > an
>
> > > > ocean of waves... "As above, so below' and."The microcosm(s)
>
> (is/
>
> > > > are) the mirror(s) of the macrocosm" (as the ancient
>
> philosopher/
>
> > > > scientist pundits say;-).
>
> > > >
>
> > > > So, the cosmos (like every universe) and every composite
form,
>
> or
>
> > > > particle-wave in it, is a hologram -- within even larger
>
> holograms
>
> > > --
>
> > > > ad infinitum. And, as the Buddhist and Vedic philosophers say.
>
> > > "All
>
> > > > is Maya" or illusion. (But, this cannot be "scientific, " even
>
> > > though
>
> > > > actual -- since conventional science can only deal with the
>
> > > physical/
>
> > > > material or measurable universe). So, what we need is a new
>
> > > > scientific paradigm -- which we might call "philosophical
>
> science"
>
> > > or
>
> > > > "scientific philosophy" or maybe just plain "theosophy". ;-)
>
> > > >
>
> > > > Best wishes,
>
> > > > Leon Maurer
>
> > > > http://canonizer. com/topic. asp/23/13 (NEW)
>
> > > > http://www.tellworl d.com/Astro. Biological. Coenergetics/
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > > On Dec 14, 2008, at 12/14/088:48 PM, Cass Silva wrote:
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > Hi Leon
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > Science has finally come around to what HPB said 100 years
>
> ago.
>
> > > > > Still the problem remains - from where the previous
universe
>
> - I
>
> > > > > guess Pralaya wouldn't explain it as it is a non-scientific
>
> > > > > concept. Did HPB mention anything about conditions during
>
> > > Pralaya?
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > Cass
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > ps Just listened to a doco on Steven Hawking - he agrees
with
>
> > > > > Greene's theory of multi-dimensional vibration strings
(rather
>
> > > than
>
> > > > > particles) and says it explains why gravity is weaker in
our 3
>
> > > > > dimensions because it has travelled through 8 others. They
are
>
> > > > > more or less stating that Quantum Mechanics explains
gravity
>
> at
>
> > > the
>
> > > > > quantum level ( at the smallest) and marries it with
>
> Relativity
>
> > > (at
>
> > > > > the largest) and Hawkings Black Hole Theory
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > If I understood it correctly they cannot explain what they
>
> call
>
> > > > > 'the singularity' other than to say the symmetry was broken
>
> and
>
> > > are
>
> > > > > now toying with the idea of universes not unlike particles,
>
> just
>
> > > > > popping in and out of existence! And this from the greatest
>
> > > minds
>
> > > > > of modern science.
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > Cass
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __
>
> > > > > From: Leon Maurer <leonmaurer@ >
>
> > > > > To: jcs-online Study forum <jcs-online@ yahoogro ups.com<jcs-
>
> online%40yahoogroup s.com>
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, 14 December, 2008 6:09:51 PM
>
> > > > > Subject: Theos-World Did our cosmos exist before the big
bang?
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > http://www.newscien tist.com/ article/mg200268 61.500-did-
>
> our-
>
> > > cosmos-
>
> > > > > exist-before- the-big-bang. html?DCMP= NLC-nletter&
>
> > > > > nsref=mg20026861 .500
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > http://tinyurl. com/5tkvfb
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > Very likely -- if the ABC fractal involved holographic field
>
> > > model of
>
> > > > > periodic cosmogenesis is correct.
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > Leon Maurer
>
> > > > > http://canonizer. com/topic. asp/23/13
>
> > > > > "Note: This canonizer topic ("HARD PROBLEM") enables us to
>
> > > directly
>
> > > > > compare theories and models of consciousness and its
>
> > > interconnections
>
> > > > > with mind, memory, brain, body, senses, etc.. If you agree
>
> with
>
> > > the
>
> > > > > ABC theory of cosmogenesis -- postulating consciousness as
an
>
> a
>
> > > > > priori quality of ubiquitous absolute space (or any other
>
> > > reasonable
>
> > > > > theory) please feel free to sign on to add your support or,
>
> if you
>
> > > > > have anything to add or contribute to the topic, or wish to
>
> post
>
> > > your
>
> > > > > own theory, open a new sub-camp or camp statement."
>
> > > > > http://www.tellworl d.com/Astro. Biological. Coenergetics/
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> > > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> > > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> > If you have not yet found that something, which at times, you
know
>
> is
>
> > missing within you and your life... it is only because 'No One'
is
>
> telling
>
> > you the truth about 'You'!
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application
