Theos-Talk Archives (December 2008 Message tt00237)

Actually, when the universe expands to its utmost and dissolves into  
pure Spirit or consciousness it GAINS entropy ad LOSES enthalpy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enthalpy

As the ancient catechism says, "Spirit materializes and Matter  
spiritualizes."

http://leonmaurer.info/ABCimages/evolution2.gif


On Dec 16, 2008, at 12/16/084:48 AM, christinaleestemaker wrote:

> Just read and see.
>
> Christina
>
>
>
> -- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Richard Semock" <semockr@...> 
> wrote:
>>
>> What he said!
>>
>> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Leon Maurer <leonmaurer@> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Cass,
>>>
>>> Yes, I think we've already broken through the last barrier toward
>>> fulfilling HPB's prophesy in the very near future.  (Perhaps this is
>>> the great new change that the Mayan calendar has been telling us
>>> is coming around 2012... Not an end, but a beginning. ;-)
>>>
>>> The final proof will come when the ABC model can be demonstrated
>>> as fact beyond a shadow of a doubt.  Already research is being
>>> planned  that will demonstrate, so everyone can see and  
>>> experience it,
>>> that the universe is a hologram, and what we can know of it is  
>>> already
>>> in our higher mind...  Pretty much the way HPB described it (if you
>>> can read the SD "in and around the words and between the lines" and
>>> cut through all the "blinds").
>>>
>>> As for the previous universe and pralaya...
>>>
>>> All that it requires, is for the universe to continue to expand and
>>> lose entropy -- until everything in it dissolves back into the
>>> aether or absolute space... With total metric space and its mass-
>>> energy "particles" and their forms compacting into infinite zero-
>>> (laya) points of spin momentum or "abstract motion" (while still
>>> containing all the information as holographic wave interference
>>> patterns)... While that aether, which in its overall nature is  
>>> like a
>>> "Bose Einstein Condensate" (see wikipedia.com) remains ONE
>>> thing...  "Whose center, when manifest, is everywhere and
>>> circumference nowhere".
>>>
>>> That "total space" (as Einstein called it) is the cosmic
>>> "singularity" that reflects itself in every potentially conscious
>>> black hole at the center of every universal form -- whose still
>>> center, at absolute zero, during pralaya, is pure (sleeping)
>>> potential cosmic consciousness and potential matter... Ready to
>>> wake up again and go through another cosmogenesis, until we all
>>> reappear in the new cycle of life, to further evolve on a higher  
>>> plane,
>>> and take up where we left off in the previous manvantara ;-)  See:
>>> http://www.leonmaurer.info/ABCimages/evolution2.gif
>>> Note that the fractal involved field model of cosmogenesis
>>> analogously applies to the physical universe as well as all the
>>> galaxies and other forms of mass-energy, on down through our
>>> solar system and planet, to the fundamental particles (spherical
>>> standing waves) of light. See:
>>> (head on cross section of a single spherically polarized photon)
>>> http://www.leonmaurer.info/ABCimages/PhotonField.gif
>>> And compare to: (cosmogenesis at the third Logos)
>>> http://www.leonmaurer.info/ABCimages/Chakrafield-spherical-col_3.jpg
>>>
>>> For an interesting take on this, see Feynman's talk about light:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjHJ7FmV0M4
>>>
>>> All that -- putting together Einstein's general relativity,  
>>> Feynman's
>>> quantum electrodynamics, Bohm-Pribram's' holographic paradigm,
>>> Kaluza-Klien-Greene-Witten-Kaku's string and membrane physics --
>>> certainly is "scientific"... And, all of it totally consistent  
>>> with the ABC
>>> model of cosmogenesis, based solely on the formulas in the Book of
>>> Dzyan, as explained by HPB.
>>>
>>> Then, when pralaya is over (as the modern scientific pundits
>>> speculate from their mathematics) -- the infinite new universes
>>> (galaxies, solar systems, planets, bacteria, plants, animals,  
>>> humans,
>>> etc,) spring up everywhere in their time and place, like spray in an
>>> ocean of waves... "As above, so below' and."The  microcosm(s) (is/
>>> are) the mirror(s) of the macrocosm" (as the ancient philosopher/
>>> scientist pundits say;-).
>>>
>>> So, the cosmos (like every universe) and every composite form, or
>>> particle-wave in it, is a hologram -- within even larger  
>>> holograms --
>>> ad infinitum.  And, as the Buddhist and Vedic philosophers say.
>>> "All is Maya" or illusion.  (But, this cannot be "scientific," even
>>> though actual -- since conventional science can only deal with the
>>> physical/material or measurable universe).  So, what we need is
>>> a new  scientific paradigm -- which we might call "philosophical
>>> science" or  "scientific philosophy" or maybe just plain  
>>> "theosophy". ;-)
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>> Leon Maurer
>>> http://canonizer.com/topic.asp/23/13 (NEW)
>>> http://www.tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 14, 2008, at 12/14/088:48 PM, Cass Silva wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Leon
>>>>
>>>> Science has finally come around to what HPB said 100 years ago.
>>>> Still the problem remains - from where the previous universe - I
>>>> guess Pralaya wouldn't explain it as it is a non-scientific
>>>> concept.  Did HPB mention anything about conditions during
>>>> Pralaya?
>>>>
>>>> Cass
>>>>
>>>> ps  Just listened to a doco on Steven Hawking - he agrees with
>>>> Greene's theory of multi-dimensional vibration strings (rather
>>>> than particles) and says it explains why gravity is weaker in our
>>>> 3 dimensions because it has travelled through 8 others.  They are
>>>> more or less stating that Quantum Mechanics explains gravity at
>>>> the quantum level ( at the smallest) and marries it with Relativity
>>>> (at the largest) and Hawkings Black Hole Theory
>>>>
>>>> If I understood it correctly they cannot explain what they call
>>>> 'the singularity' other than to say the symmetry was broken and
>>>> are now toying with the idea of universes not unlike particles,  
>>>> just
>>>> popping in and out of existence!   And this from the greatest
>>>> minds of modern science.
>>>>
>>>> Cass
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: Leon Maurer <leonmaurer@>
>>>> To: jcs-online Study forum <jcs-online@yahoogroups.com>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, 14 December, 2008 6:09:51 PM
>>>> Subject: Theos-World Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.newscien tist.com/ article/mg200268 61.500
>>>> -did-our-cosmos-exist-before- the-big-bang.
>>>> html?DCMP=NLC-nletter&nsref=mg20026861.500
>>>>
>>>> http://tinyurl. com/5tkvfb
>>>>
>>>> Very likely -- if the ABC fractal involved holographic field
>>>> model of periodic cosmogenesis is correct.
>>>>
>>>> Leon Maurer
>>>> http://canonizer. com/topic. asp/23/13
>>>> "Note: This canonizer topic ("HARD PROBLEM") enables us to
>>>> directly compare theories and models of consciousness and its
>>>> interconnections with mind, memory, brain, body, senses, etc..
>>>> If you agree with the ABC theory of cosmogenesis -- postulating
>>>> consciousness as an a priori quality of ubiquitous absolute space
>>>> (or any other reasonable theory) please feel free to sign on to
>>>> add your support or, if you have anything to add or contribute
>>>> to the topic, or wish to post your own theory, open a new
>>>> sub-camp or camp statement."
>>>> http://www.tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics/
>>>>
>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]