Theos-Talk Archives (October 2008 Message tt00608)

Theosophy is: we cannot say what another needs for the levels upside 
down.
We only can guess for ourselves.
And if we read ML we can forget a mass of words not necessary for us.
While of course there still are Humes.
I don't know what you have with newage or reiki, but I have no cup of 
tea of it.Do you know what reiki means?
Rich I.

And poppycock, what means that?
I am not a poppy , also not a cock without head.
So don't need a master at all, especially not one with Big Ego.
Christina




--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Reitemeyer" <dzyan@...> 
wrote:
>
> Poppycock, without a Master you will never come to buddhi.
> That is proud (female?) new age rhetoric and Reiki blabla, psychic 
illusions, but not theosophy and not reality.
> 
> "Evolution goes on"?
> 
> Do you say that evolution changed the last 100 years?
> 
> Again, no one of those people who claimed to get possession of the 
occult teachings without a master have so far presented a proof - for 
example one single page of the quality of The Secret Doctrine.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: christinaleestemaker 
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2008 12:36 AM
> Subject: Theos-World Re: So Anand, what about Master Koot Hoomi??
> 
> 
> Frank, that is a century ago.
> Possibly with buddhi insight, one don't need a master, for he or 
she 
> is a master him -or herself.And for sure there would be any 
etherical 
> influence from the higher levels.
> 
> I take what is in the teachings, but don't stay hanging in it.Times 
> goes on , or evolution goes on.For everyone, what he or she needed.
> 
> Why we cannot influence the bad, materialistic, selfish economy in 
> this world, with the knowledge we have???
> Is that not a great issue for theosophy ? Better than staying 
outside 
> this world.Or sitting on a rose cloud. In this world we have to 
make 
> it and as we see we have not learned yet in a century.What can few 
> persons do? we need the scale of 100 or maybe 1000 or more.
> Christina.
> 
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Reitemeyer" <dzyan@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > But HPB does not belong to the group of people who believe they 
can 
> find the teachings wihtout a leader.
> > She had her own Master.
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: christinaleestemaker 
> > To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 6:42 PM
> > Subject: Theos-World Re: So Anand, what about Master Koot Hoomi??
> > 
> > 
> > Such people did not hang it on the Big Ben.For reasons you see 
what 
> > happened to HPB.
> > 
> > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Reitemeyer" <dzyan@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >By the way, who need leaders?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Everyone, who wants to receive the occult teachings in the 
right 
> > way needs a 
> > > teacher.
> > > 
> > > Those, who do not need the teachings and are satisfied with 
> > themselves or 
> > > with the books they can buy need no teacher.
> > > As this is the mindset f.e. of the ULT, no teacher comes to 
them 
> > and they 
> > > miss him not.
> > > So both sides are satisfied.
> > > 
> > > >Cannot we lead ourselves?
> > > 
> > > Hardly possible. In fact I have never met such a person or have 
> > heard about 
> > > it.
> > > Those who proudly proclaim that they can find the teachings for 
> > themselves 
> > > have so far never given a proof of their claim.
> > > 
> > > Frank
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>