Theos-Talk Archives (September 2008 Message tt00188)

Well, once we have created one, we can keep working at it until we perfect  
the technique so if all goes well, the present universe will be sort of 
improved  in about a hundred years, or 13 billion years ago, whichever calendar you 
are  using.
 
It all gets very confusing, this universe creating business, but it is  great 
fun.
 
Chuck the Heretic
 
 
In a message dated 9/24/2008 8:06:57 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
silva_cass@yahoo.com writes:

 
 
 
Perhaps if it was the first universe your theory may have had some  validity, 
but seeing or believing in the teachings, suggests that the creation  of our 
universe was not a practice run. 

Cass

----- Original  Message ----
From: A M <_anandaam@googlemailanan_ (mailto:anandaam@googlemail.com) >
To:  _theos-talk@yahoogrotheos-t_ (mailto:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com) 
Sent:  Wednesday, 24 September, 2008 7:12:32 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re:  Daniel, why don't you warn readers about 
Blavatsky's  mist...

John,

If science were to follow the uncertainty  principle back to universal
origins it might end up proclaiming that the  universe arose in an
instant, not out of the big bang, but out of a moment  of doubt.

Murthy

2008/9/23 <Augoeides-222@  comcast.net>
> Chuck,
> OMG!!!! Are you implying that Mt.  Meru is made of Granulated Uncertainty
> Particles and Pebbles??? Is  there a relation to the Uncertainty Principle 
in
> modern Physics???? If  the Universe is built by Uncertainity Particles that
> means we are  intrinsicely and immutably and irrevocably all composed of
>  Uncertainity Itself!!! Could that be why we argue so much about anything  
and
> everything?? ? The very Air we breathe must also be composed of  vast 
numbers
> of Uncertianty particles that are certainly uncertain  where they came from
> or where they are going!!! OMG we don't have even  a single Atom of 
Certainty
> in our entire body!!!! Could there also be  an Uncertainity Doom Theory???
>
> Regards,
> John  (uncertain about that)
>
> ------------ -- Original message  ------------ --
> From: Drpsionic@aol. com
> If Theosophy is  anything, it is ambiguous. The cosmos is built upon
>  uncertainty.
>
> Chuck the Heretic
>
> In a message  dated 9/23/2008 7:36:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> silva_cass@yahoo.  com writes:
>
> Theosophy is a philosophy not a religion and as a  philosophy it must be
> coherent and without ambiguity. Leadbeater  brought ambiguity into theosophy
> by
> preaching opposing dogma  to what was stated by the originators. Dugpas are
> Masters of  Uncertainty!
>
> Cass
>
> ----- Original Message  ----
> From: Martin <_Mvandertak@ yahoo.Mva_  (mailto:Mvandertak@_Mvandertak@>
> To: _theos-talk@  yahoogrotheos- t_ (mailto:theos- To: _theos-talk@  
> Sent:  Tuesday, 23 September, 2008 8:40:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Re:  Daniel, why don't you warn readers about
> Blavatsky's mistakes  ?
>
> Aren't we all believing in lies and half Truths?
>  Theosophy is wisdom of the gods it is said; if we want to believe in  the
> Truth we need to go for Ethymo-sophia or the wisdom of the Real or  reality
> and
> not some poxy stuff about gods, philosophers and  scientists. Reality is now
> and not in the past nor the future; we can  use the now springboarding into
> eternity.
> If there was so much  truth in theosophy, why are people still discussing it
> instead of  launching new ideas coming from the same source and developing
> f.i.  anthroposophy and alike science...
>
> --- On Tue, 9/23/08, Cass  Silva <silva_cass@ silva_cass> wrote:
>
> From: Cass Silva  <silva_cass@ silva_cass>
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: Daniel,  why don't you warn readers about
> Blavatsky's mistakes ?
> To:  theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
> Date: Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 2:23  AM
>
> Daniel
> Anand will never admit that Leadbeater got  it wrong because he would then
> have to admit that he (Anand) has spent  40 years in believing in lies.
>
> Cass
>
> -----  Original Message ----
> From: Anand <AnandGholap@  gmail.com>
> To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
> Sent: Monday, 22  September, 2008 7:05:53 PM
> Subject: Theos-World Re: Daniel, why don't  you warn readers about
> Blavatsky's mistakes ?
>
> Subject  of Theosophy, as understood by world and students of
> Theosophy, is  complex. When I read messages of students of Blavatsky
> and messages of  students of CWL, I find that what they understand
> Theosophy and it's  main concepts is very different. That means
> Theosophical understanding  of students of Blavatsky is different from
> understanding of students  of Leadbeater. Differences are big and on
> important topics. It is  possible that HPB and CWL had same meaning in
> mind but expressed that  in different words. But their impact is
> certainly different on people.  If somebody is referring Theosophy, I
> might ask "are you talking about  Theosophy of Blavatsky or are you
> talking about Theosophy of  Besant-Leadbeater ?"
> Similarly reactions of westerners and Christians  to Theosophy depend
> on what they consider as Theosophy. When they  consider Blavatsky's
> writing as Theosophy, they ridicule, hate  Theosophy. Such hatred is
> not expressed by those Christians who  consider CWL's writing as Theosophy.
> I have come to a point where it  is necessary to make clear distinction
> between Theosophy of  Leadbeater-Besant and Theosophy of Blavatsky. As
> these two are  different and have different effects on people, I feel
> that such  distinction is very necessary. It is because we often come
> in contact  with students of Blavatsky not agreeing with students of
> Leadbeater  and CWL-students ignoring Blavatsky's writing.
> I am also feeling a  need of writing article making it clear which
> Theosophy I support and  which Theosophy I reject. I agreed with CWL,
> but I did not agree with  Krishnamurti. I felt Krishnamurti' s teaching
> would do damage to  humanity. So I rejected openly K's teaching, just
> as Catholic church  openly rejects abortion and gay marriage.
> I feel that I should now  write article on which Theosophical ideas I
> support and which  Theosophical ideas I reject.
> Best
> Anand Gholap
>
>  Make the switch to the world&#39;s best email. Get Yahoo!7 Mail!
>  __http://au.yahoo._ (http://au.yahoo./)  _  (_http://au.yahoo._ 
(http://au.yahoo./)  /)  com/y7mail
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been  removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been  removed]
>
> Make the switch to the world&#39;s best email.  Get Yahoo!7 Mail!
> __http://au.yahoo._ (http://au.yahoo./)  _http://au._ (http://au./)  _ 
(_http://au.yahoo._ (http://au.yahoo./)  com/y7mail)
>
>  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  ************ **Looking for simple solutions to your real-life  financial
> challenges? Check out WalletPop for the latest news and  information, tips
> and
> calculators. (_http://www.walletpo_ (http://www.walletpo/)   p.com/?NCID= 
emlcntuswall0000 0001)
>
> [Non-text portions of this  message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message  have been removed]
>
> 

-- 
A.M.


Make the  switch to the world&#39;s best email. Get Yahoo!7 Mail! 
_http://au.yahoo.http://au._ (http://au.yahoo.com/y7mail) 

[Non-text  portions of this message have been removed]


 




**************Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial 
challenges?  Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips and 
calculators.      (http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]