Theos-Talk Archives (September 2008 Message tt00187)

But that is exactly what happened and there is nothing occult about  it.  The 
only question is how did it get that way.
 
Chuck the Heretic
 
 
In a message dated 9/24/2008 8:02:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
silva_cass@yahoo.com writes:

 
 
 
Suppose an Occultist were to claim that the first grand organ of a  cathedral 
had come originally into being in the following manner. First, there  was a 
progressive and gradual elaboration in Space of an organizable material,  which 
resulted in the production of a state of matter named organic PROTEIN.  Then, 
under the influence of incident forces, those states having been thrown  into 
a phase of unstable equilibrium, they slowly and majestically evolved  into 
and resulted in new combinations of carved and polished wood, of brass  pins 
and staples, of leather and ivory, wind-pipes and bellows. After which,  having 
adapted all its parts into one harmonious and symmetrical machine, the  organ 
suddenly pealed forth Mozart's Requiem. This was followed by a Sonata of  
Beethoven, etc., ad infinitum;its keys playing of themselves and the wind  blowing 
into the pipes by its own inherent force and fancy. . . . . What would  
Science say to such a theory? Yet, it is precisely
in such wise that the  materialistic savants tell us that the Universe was 
formed, with its millions  of beings, and man, its spiritual crown.
HPB

Cass

-----  Original Message ----
From: "_Augoeides-222@Augoeides-2_ (mailto:Augoeides-222@comcast.net) "  
<_Augoeides-222@Augoeides-2_ (mailto:Augoeides-222@comcast.net) >
To:  _theos-talk@yahoogrotheos-t_ (mailto:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com) ;  
_theos-talk@yahoogrotheos-t_ (mailto:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com) 
Cc:  _Drpsionic@aol.Drp_ (mailto:Drpsionic@aol.com) 
Sent:  Wednesday, 24 September, 2008 7:05:06 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re:  Daniel, why don't you warn readers about 
Blavatsky's  mist...

Chuck,
OMG!!!! Are you implying that Mt. Meru is made of  Granulated Uncertainty 
Particles and Pebbles??? Is there a relation to the  Uncertainty Principle in 
modern Physics???? If the Universe is built by  Uncertainity Particles that means 
we are intrinsicely and immutably and  irrevocably all composed of 
Uncertainity Itself!!! Could that be why we argue  so much about anything and 
everything?? ? The very Air we breathe must also be  composed of vast numbers of 
Uncertianty particles that are certainly uncertain  where they came from or where 
they are going!!! OMG we don't have even a  single Atom of Certainty in our 
entire body!!!! Could there also be an  Uncertainity Doom Theory???

Regards, 
John (uncertain about  that)

------------ -- Original message ------------ -- 
From:  Drpsionic@aol. com 
If Theosophy is anything, it is ambiguous. The cosmos  is built upon 
uncertainty.

Chuck the Heretic

In a message  dated 9/23/2008 7:36:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
silva_cass@yahoo. com  writes:

Theosophy is a philosophy not a religion and as a philosophy it  must be 
coherent and without ambiguity. Leadbeater brought ambiguity into  theosophy 
by 
preaching opposing dogma to what was stated by the  originators. Dugpas are 
Masters of Uncertainty!

Cass

-----  Original Message ----
From: Martin <_Mvandertak@ yahoo.Mva_  (mailto:Mvandertak@_Mvandertak@>
To: _theos-talk@ yahoogrotheos- t_  (mailto:theos-To: _theos-talk@ yahoog
Sent: Tuesday, 23 September,  2008 8:40:10 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: Daniel, why don't you warn  readers about 
Blavatsky's mistakes ?

Aren't we all believing in  lies and half Truths?
Theosophy is wisdom of the gods it is said; if we  want to believe in the 
Truth we need to go for Ethymo-sophia or the wisdom  of the Real or reality 
and 
not some poxy stuff about gods, philosophers  and scientists. Reality is now 
and not in the past nor the future; we can  use the now springboarding into 
eternity.
If there was so much truth in  theosophy, why are people still discussing it 
instead of launching new  ideas coming from the same source and developing 
f.i. anthroposophy and  alike science...

--- On Tue, 9/23/08, Cass Silva <silva_cass@  silva_cass> wrote:

From: Cass Silva <silva_cass@  silva_cass>
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: Daniel, why don't you warn  readers about 
Blavatsky's mistakes ?
To: theos-talk@yahoogro  ups.com
Date: Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 2:23 AM

Daniel 
Anand  will never admit that Leadbeater got it wrong because he would then 
have  to admit that he (Anand) has spent 40 years in believing in  lies.

Cass

----- Original Message ----
From: Anand  <AnandGholap@ gmail.com>
To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
Sent:  Monday, 22 September, 2008 7:05:53 PM
Subject: Theos-World Re: Daniel, why  don't you warn readers about 
Blavatsky's mistakes ?

Subject of  Theosophy, as understood by world and students of
Theosophy, is complex.  When I read messages of students of Blavatsky
and messages of students of  CWL, I find that what they understand
Theosophy and it's main concepts is  very different. That means
Theosophical understanding of students of  Blavatsky is different from
understanding of students of Leadbeater.  Differences are big and on
important topics. It is possible that HPB and  CWL had same meaning in
mind but expressed that in different words. But  their impact is
certainly different on people. If somebody is referring  Theosophy, I
might ask "are you talking about Theosophy of Blavatsky or are  you
talking about Theosophy of Besant-Leadbeater ?"
Similarly reactions  of westerners and Christians to Theosophy depend
on what they consider as  Theosophy. When they consider Blavatsky's
writing as Theosophy, they  ridicule, hate Theosophy. Such hatred is
not expressed by those Christians  who consider CWL's writing as Theosophy.
I have come to a point where it is  necessary to make clear distinction
between Theosophy of Leadbeater-Besant  and Theosophy of Blavatsky. As
these two are different and have different  effects on people, I feel
that such distinction is very necessary. It is  because we often come
in contact with students of Blavatsky not agreeing  with students of
Leadbeater and CWL-students ignoring Blavatsky's writing.  
I am also feeling a need of writing article making it clear  which
Theosophy I support and which Theosophy I reject. I agreed with  CWL,
but I did not agree with Krishnamurti. I felt Krishnamurti' s  teaching
would do damage to humanity. So I rejected openly K's teaching,  just
as Catholic church openly rejects abortion and gay marriage.
I feel  that I should now write article on which Theosophical ideas I
support and  which Theosophical ideas I reject.
Best
Anand Gholap

Make the  switch to the world&#39;s best email. Get Yahoo!7 Mail! 
__http://au.yahoo._ (http://au.yahoo./)  _ (_http://au.yahoo._ 
(http://au.yahoo./)  /)  com/y7mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been  removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been  removed]

Make the switch to the world&#39;s best email. Get Yahoo!7  Mail! 
__http://au.yahoo._ (http://au.yahoo./)  _http://au._ (http://au./)  _ 
(_http://au.yahoo._ (http://au.yahoo./)  com/y7mail) 

[Non-text  portions of this message have been removed]

************ **Looking for  simple solutions to your real-life financial 
challenges? Check out  WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips 
and 
calculators. (_http://www.walletpo_ (http://www.walletpo/)   p.com/?NCID= 
emlcntuswall0000 0001)

[Non-text portions of this message  have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been  removed]

Make the switch to the world&#39;s best email. Get Yahoo!7  Mail! 
_http://au.yahoo.http://au._ (http://au.yahoo.com/y7mail) 

[Non-text  portions of this message have been removed]


 




**************Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial 
challenges?  Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips and 
calculators.      (http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]