Theos-Talk Archives (December 2006 Message tt00367)

In this posting I first give the 7 statements I've culled
from Mr. Aveline's posting on Gregory Tillett.  My comments,etc.
will be found AFTER the listing of the 7 statements.

FIRST THE LISTING:

(1) Tillett is "deeply un-interested in Theosophy"

(2) Tillett "does not pretend to be a theosophist."

(3) Tillett "is a specialist and he should see himself as such." And
Tillett "is obviously a specialist in Adyar."

(4) Tillett "only seeks to understand the outward and bureaucratic
levels of the ritualistic version of the Adyar theosophical movement."

(5) Tillett "cannot be expected to see the moral and spiritual
difference between the Leadbeater/Besant Society and the ULT."

(6) "As to the ULT, it seems he [Tillett] does not know it and does
not like it."

(7) Tillett "did not study the ULT. In order to be able to do that,
he probably would have to study Theosophy first."

MY COMMENTS:

Now the factuality or truthfulness of these 7 statements by Mr. Aveline 
RESTS ON THE ASSUMPTION that Mr. Aveline ACTUALLY knows all of this as 
given in the above listing.

But how does Mr. Aveline know what Tillett knows or has studied, 
etc.????

Mr. Aveline also states that Tillett does not know the ULT yet HOW MUCH 
does Mr. Aveline REALLY know about the ULT.  In other words, does Mr. 
Aveline write from a position based on actual and indepth knowledge of 
the ULT?

How long has Mr. Aveline been an associate of the ULT???

How many ULT meetings has he attended???

How many ULT associates does he personally know?? etc.

How much does Mr. Aveline actually know about the structure and 
workings (outer and inner) of the ULT???

Daniel