Here is part of what Aveline IGNORES.....
Dec 09, 2006 07:56 PM
by danielhcaldwell
Although Mr. Aveline has made many assumptions
about Tillett and what Tillett knows or doesn't know,
etc. etc., Mr. Aveline does NOT directly deal with Tillett's
actual statements and observations about the ULT. BELOW are two of
Tillett's comments:
=====================================================
My attempts to obtain direct answers to questions about the ULT have
resulted in some of the most bizarre responses, both on this site and
in direct e-mails, of my experience. It's been like trying to obtain
direct answers from politicians! For an organization that claims to
be open and non-authoritarian, the non-responses suggest an
organization more like the secret service.
===================================================
=============================================================
But I have never met with such a strange "we are totally open" while
being less accessible than the CIA approach than I have found with
the ULT. Individual members (including various librarians who, I
presume, could not have been librarians because "librarian"
presupposes an office!) have been kind and generous – but have never
answered a single historical question directly unless it could be
done with an (apparently) almost memorized section of one of the ULT
official tracts. It's like trying to gather up quicksilver!
=============================================================
HOW does one explain the responses of these ULT associates?
That is one of the questions that readily comes to mind.
Daniel
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application
