Theos-Talk Archives (December 2006 Message tt00059)

Carlos,
You wrote:
"I am surprised to see how little you and Daniel have written so far 
about the difficulties and dissensions in the theosophical movement 
in the USA at the beginning of 20th century. Those difficulties and 
divisions, as you probably know, were created or powerfully 
stimulated by elemental; by elementaries; and by enemies of the 
movement. Fortunately, they have all lost their importance and 
significance, while the philosophy of Theosophy, which is shared by 
Point Loma groups, the Pasadena TS and the ULT, among others, makes 
real progress."

Could you please explain what you exactly mean with that, hence 
based on what you have said before, it doesn't make any real sense 
to me. Which "divisions" within in the American Theosophical 
Movement from the beginning of 20th century "were created or 
powerfully stimulated by elemental; by elementaries; and by enemies 
of the movement", from you point of view? Who are you after? From 
a "ULT-point-of-view" it sounds like you first was after Madame 
Tingley, but then afterwards you started to count up different 
branches of the TM, and including Point Loma and Pasadena.

Carl

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline" 
<carlosaveline@...> wrote:
>
> Carl,
> 
> I am surprised to see how little you and Daniel  have written so 
far about the difficulties and dissensions in the theosophical 
movement in the USA at the beginning of 20th century.  Those 
difficulties and divisions, as you probably know, were created or 
powerfully stimulated  by elemental;  by elementaries;  and by 
enemies of the movement.  Fortunately, they have all lost their 
importance and significance, while the philosophy of Theosophy, 
which is shared by Point Loma groups, the Pasadena TS and the ULT, 
among others,  makes real progress.   Regards,  Carlos. 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>