Theos-Talk Archives (November 2006 Message tt01328)

Dear Duane,


Thanks. 

In fact I have read several of Alice Bailey's books and I have them in my library. Alice Bailey's vision about the Masters and their levels of initiation is apparently not very far away from Besant's and Leadbeater's,  and by the late 1990s I saw I felt I should rely on HPB and in the various volumes of  letters from the Masters, on occult matters. 

By the way, what makes me have a broad sympathy for Alice Bailey and "World Good Will" is a series of other factors:  

First, it is much more a network organization than a "Vatican" or top-down structure. 

Second,  World Good Will works very much on the planetary consciousness, on the planetary citizenship, on the importance of the United Nations, something of great importance in my view, and something which unfortunately other sections of the movement have apparently forgotten. 

Third, the World Good Will does not publicizes attacks to HPB or the Masters, as some of the Adyar TS people now do.  

Fourth, Alice Bailey led a pure life as long as I know. 

Fifth, World Good Will has a bright view about humanity, which is something which I consider "most needed" these days.

So, although I am rather "conservative" in occult views, I have a general sympathy for World Good Will. 

Regards,   Carlos. 


De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Cópia:

Data:Wed, 29 Nov 2006 05:44:28 -0800 (PST)

Assunto:Theos-World Initiations of the Masters

> Carlos
> If you want to get a quick reference to some of the Theosophical Masters and their respective places in the Spiritual Hierarchy and what initiations they have undergone go to
> Solar and Planetary Hierarchies - Chart
> If the chart doesn't come up go to the works of Alice Bailey scroll to the bottom of the page where it says charts and open Planetary and Solar Hierarchies. This chart puts the Christ as a sixth degree initiate, DK a fifth and Master Jesus as a fourth. I am not saying this chart is infallible but might be useful in the present discussion. D-
> 
> 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]