Theos-Talk Archives (November 2006 Message tt00364)

Carlos,

1)	The fact that SJ, has been closed shows that SJ and the 
Vatican, not "always" had been on friendly foot with one another. 
And the Vatican and SJ, are today in a big conflict, partly because 
JP2 preferred the Opus Dei.
2)	I know that the "Theology of Liberation" is more of 
Franciscans, and even more an OMI thing. I don't totally agree with 
you that "the classical task of Jesuits has been widely taken over 
by the 'Opus Dei" and not that "Opus Dei' is the new version of the 
classical Jesuits". Only that the Opus Dei has taken over al the 
negative and "nasty" parts. SJ has an "esoteric" base in their 
belief; the Opus Dei is fundamentalistic Roman Catholics. But that 
we can leave. 
3)	I don't study writings of HPB and Masters as historical 
literature, but hence they contain esoteric knowledge and wisdom. 
But I know very well what they are saying about the Jesuits. I agree 
with them, but still, the SJ are very much misunderstood. Often, 
even by Theosophists, it is missed their real inner, black magical 
and "occult", spirit; that are the "Dugpas" of Christianity. 
Cesarism was supported by SJ, but hardly not so much more today. 

Carl

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline" 
<carlosaveline@...> wrote:
>
> Carl,
> 
> 1) The OFFICIAL closing of the Jesuits only happened for some 
time. They had abused too much; they were involved, for instance, in 
killing Portugal's king. They had to be stopped, at least in part.   
> 
> 2) The recent "Theology of Liberation" is more of Franciscans, and 
Latin Americans.  True, some Jesuits supported and still support 
it.  But, please, take into consideration the public fact that in 
the 20th century the classical task of Jesuits has been widely taken 
over by the 'Opus Dei'.  This is obvious and public today and has 
been so since the 1960s, say.   'Opus Dei' is the new version of the 
classical Jesuits. Same methods, same 'personal  loyalty to the 
Pope', etc.
> 
> 3) If you study HPB and the Mahatma Letters, you will see the 
Jesuits were the great allies to the Pope up to the 19th century.  
They are historically linked to the very  idea that the Popes are to 
be seen as "absolute monarchs" -- of course, with the help of their 
secret police and 'intelligence agency',the  Jesuits...  This is 
well documented...
> 
> By the way, we have had long and fruitful discussions here on 
Vatican, Jesuits and Opus Dei, earlier in 2006.  
> 
> 
> Regards,  Carlos. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> 
> Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> 
> Cópia:
> 
> Data:Mon, 06 Nov 2006 04:24:35 -0000
> 
> Assunto:[Spam] Theos-World Re: CARL AND CEREMONIALISM
> 
> > Carlos,
> > 
> > You say:
> > "The Jesuits have almost always been most influential 
(and 'loyal') 
> > as to the Popes."
> > 
> > I say; not true.
> > 
> > "The Suppression of the Jesuits in Portugal, France, the Two 
> > Sicilies, Parma and the Spanish Empire by 1767 was troubling to 
the 
> > Society's defender, Pope Clement XIII. Following a decree signed 
by 
> > Pope Clement XIV under secular pressure in July 1773, the 
Jesuits 
> > were suppressed in all countries except Russia, where Catherine 
the 
> > Great had forbidden the papal decree to be promulgated. Because 
> > millions of Catholics (including many Jesuits) lived in the 
Polish 
> > western provinces of the Russian Empire, the Society was able to 
> > maintain its legal existence and carry on its work all through 
the 
> > period of suppression."
> > From" 
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuits
> > See further:
> > http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14086a.htm
> > http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14099a.htm
> > http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14081a.htm
> > http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14096a.htm
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suppression_of_the_Jesuits
> > 
> > "Jesuits have had significant influence in the development of 
> > liberation theology, a movement which has been highly 
controversial 
> > in the Catholic theological community and condemned by Pope John 
> > Paul II on several fundamental aspects."
> > 
> > From: 
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuits
> > 
> > 
> > "In April 2005, Thomas J. Reese, SJ, editor of the American 
Jesuit 
> > weekly magazine America, resigned at the request of the Society. 
The 
> > move was widely published in the media as the result of pressure 
> > from the Vatican, following years of criticism by the 
Congregation 
> > for the Doctrine of the Faith on articles touching subjects such 
as 
> > HIV/AIDS, religious pluralism, homosexuality and the right of 
life 
> > for the unborn. Reese is currently on a year-long sabbatical at 
> > Santa Clara University.
> > 
> > On February 2, 2006, Fr. Peter Hans Kolvenbach, informed members 
of 
> > the Society of Jesus, that with the consent of Pope Benedict 
XVI, he 
> > intends to step down as Superior General in 2008, the year he 
will 
> > turn 80. The 35th General Congregation of the Society of Jesus 
that 
> > will elect a new superior general, and decide other important 
policy 
> > for the Jesuit order in the years to come, will convene on 5 
January 
> > 2008, in Rome."
> > 
> > From: 
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuits
> > 
> > 
> > "The Jesuits have frequently been described by their enemies 
(both 
> > Catholic and Protestant) as engaged in various conspiracies. The 
> > Monita secreta, published 1614 in Kraków, allegedly written by 
> > Claudio Acquaviva, in reality by Jerome Zahorowski, were 
fabricated 
> > to expose such a conspiracy. They have also been accused of 
using 
> > casuistry to obtain justifications for the unjustifiable. In 
several 
> > languages, "Jesuit" or "Jesuitical" therefore acquired a 
secondary 
> > meaning of "devious." The Jesuits have also been targeted by 
many 
> > anti-Catholics like Jack Chick, Avro Manhattan, and Alberto 
Rivera. 
> > Among other things they point to the text of an extreme oath 
> > allegedly taken by advanced members of the order, which can be 
> > construed to justify any action including infiltration of other 
> > faiths as legitimate in the name of the "greater good." The 
Jesuits 
> > have been accused of murdering Popes and presidents, causing 
wars, 
> > and toppling governments. There is also a claim common among 
many 
> > anti-Catholics that the Jesuit Superior General rules the 
Vatican 
> > behind the scenes.
> > 
> > Within the Catholic Church, some Jesuits are criticized by some 
> > parties for being overly liberal and deviating substantially 
from 
> > official Church teaching and papal directives, especially on 
such 
> > issues as abortion, priestly celibacy, homosexuality, and 
liberation 
> > theology.[13] Pope Benedict XVI, like his predecessor John Paul 
II, 
> > has been particularly critical of the order.[14] Indeed, it is 
not 
> > unusual, especially in more conservative Catholic outlets, to 
hear 
> > calls for the outright abolishment of the Jesuit order. Thus, 
some 
> > may argue that the future influence of the Jesuits in the 
Catholic 
> > community, and perhaps their very existence, remains uncertain, 
> > while others may note that the Jesuit Order is well established 
in 
> > the Church and the communities where they intervene."
> > 
> > From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuits#Controversies
> > 
> > See further:
> > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?
> > 
xml=/news/2005/05/08/wjes08.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/05/08/ixworld.html
> > http://www.cwnews.com/offtherecord/offtherecord.cfm?
> > task=singledisplay&recnum=2627
> > http://www.nationalreview.com/kurtz/kurtz031302.asp
> > http://www.nationalreview.com/kurtz/kurtz031302.asp
> > http://www.natcath.com/NCR_Online/archives/081100/081100e.htm
> > http://www.sspx.ca/Angelus/1984_November/Pope_Jesuits.htm
> > http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/pope/obit/theo_authority.shtml
> > 
> > In a review of "The Pope and the Jesuits" by James Hitchcock by 
> > Father Philip M. Stark we read:
> > "The outline of the book is simple. After a brief glance, we see 
> > Pope John Paul II putting his own representative (an Italian 
Jesuit) 
> > at the head of the Order until a new superior general can be 
elected 
> > to replace the permanently incapacitated Father Pedro Arrupe. 
There 
> > was great indignation in the ranks when this happened, I well 
> > remember. I also remember thinking how ironic it was that 
resentment 
> > should be directed at a Pope who was worried enough about the 
> > activities of the Order to intervene in its government?the very 
> > Order founded to give unquestioning obedience to the Holy See. 
It 
> > seemed like treason to think it, but I thought it: the Jesuits 
have 
> > lost sight of the reason for their existence. Professor 
Hitchcock 
> > has now confirmed that impression for me."
> > From: http://www.sspx.ca/Angelus/1984_November/Pope_Jesuits.htm
> > "I must add, as a parenthesis, that reading this painful record 
of 
> > the trouble the Jesuits are giving poor Pope John Paul has given 
me 
> > a new respect for him."
> > 
> > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline" 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Carl,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > You say: 
> > > 
> > > " I can see that you are not a Mason, and therefore you have a 
> > good 
> > > reason to not know real Meaning of Freemasonry."
> > > 
> > > I say:
> > > 
> > > "I am not. But about it I know for a fact more than I feel at 
> > ease to write about in Theos-talk; so please do not jump to 
final 
> > conclusions."
> > > 
> > > You say: 
> > > 
> > > "I know HPB said that Freemasonry was infiltrated by the 
Jesuits, 
> > but this has nothing to do with the Vatican, hence the Vatican 
and 
> > Jesuits often don't like one another." 
> > > 
> > > I say:
> > > 
> > > "Not true. The Jesuits have almost always been most 
influential 
> > (and 'loyal') as to the Popes. They have worked as the Popes' 
CIA 
> > or 'M.I. 5', say. HPB wrote about that. Anyway, the true fact 
> > remains that the Masonry has been utterly infiltrated by its 
> > enemies; and by HPB's enemies; although individual Masons, 
> > including some influential ones, were real Occultists amid the 
bad 
> > stuff; id est, the exception to the rule. "
> > > 
> > > As to living in a "Catholic" country -- again this is jumping 
and 
> > personalizing conclusions. 
> > > 
> > > In order to illustrate that, I will tell you that I was never 
> > baptized in any Church, Christian or otherwise, in this 
lifetime, 
> > which is more than many people can say about their ' original 
non-
> > churchianity'. And never believed in any Christian "God", too. 
> > > 
> > > Try to think impersonally, please. Personalistic projections 
end 
> > up by making the game of you-know-whom (lower level 
elementals) . 
> > > 
> > > I see you as a sincere truth-seeker and I respect you for 
that. 
> > > 
> > > We are exchanging views. Neither of us is the truth-owner, I 
> > guess, on any subject. We are searching for a better 
understanding 
> > of life. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Carlos. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > 
> > > Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > 
> > > Cópia:
> > > 
> > > Data:Sat, 04 Nov 2006 16:36:12 -0000
> > > 
> > > Assunto:Theos-World Re: CEREMONIALISM and HPB
> > > 
> > > > Carlos,
> > > > 
> > > > I can see that you are not a Mason, and therefore you have a 
> > good 
> > > > reason to not know real Meaning of Freemasonry.
> > > > 
> > > > Second, please, stop talk about Leadbeater in these matters. 
He 
> > has 
> > > > nothing to do in a serious discussion. 
> > > > 
> > > > And further. You writ; "the Masonry was so heavily and
> > > > freely infiltrated by the Vatican Jesuits centuries ago, as 
you 
> > > > certainly know
> > > > HPB says." I know she said that Freemasonry infiltrated by 
the 
> > > > Jesuits, but this has nothing to do with the Vatican, hence 
the 
> > > > Vatican and Jesuits often don't like one another. To 
> > say "heavily 
> > > > and freely" is to over react. There is only one 
know "Jesuit" 
> > (he 
> > > > was not even a real Jesuit, but something similar to a 
tertiary 
> > > > member, even if SJ don't have that officially), that have 
made a 
> > > > carrier in Masonry, and that was Magister Johann August 
Starck, 
> > > > active mason ca. 1750-70. This connection Jesuits ? 
Freemason is 
> > > > untrue, as the Nazis Freemasons ? Jews is untrue. That is al 
> > based, 
> > > > and with its routs, in Anti-Masonry (from low-church 
> > protestants, in 
> > > > the US). 
> > > > 
> > > > Carlos, I think you are mixing things up. This could be 
hence 
> > you 
> > > > are from a Catholic country, but no I'm only guessing. 
Ritual 
> > and 
> > > > ritual is not always the same thing.
> > > > 
> > > > You wrote; "Jesus, Buddha and Lao Tzu -- 2,500 years ago -- 
were 
> > > > already critical of their time ritualisms and sacerdotal 
> > > > hierarchies. So this thing is not 'entirely new'." On this 
is my 
> > > > comment that one find, what one is looking for.
> > > > 
> > > > And: "Still, I did not see HPB writing about ritualism, or 
> > defending 
> > > > it as a practice
> > > > for theosophists. Did you?" And still she wrote several 
rituals 
> > here 
> > > > self, fore the use in the ES, and let Olcott write rituals 
for 
> > TS. 
> > > > 
> > > > And: "I am generally friendly toward Masons, but I do not 
think 
> > > > there should be any
> > > > confusion between the theosophical movement and any Rites 
and 
> > > > Ritualisms,
> > > > masonic or otherwise.
> > > > 
> > > > These are two quite different movements..." 
> > > > 
> > > > As said above about to know real Meaning of Freemasonry. 
They 
> > are 
> > > > not as different as you may think (in Spirit). And I don't 
share 
> > > > your opinion on nether rituals, or your opinion on what 
> > Theosophy is 
> > > > saying about it. The problem is that Masonry, as HBP said, 
> > soulless 
> > > > without the Philosophy of the East, but still it the last 
> > reaming 
> > > > part of the Western Mystery Schools. One most see masonry as 
it 
> > > > really is, and what is it origin. And very, very few Masons 
know 
> > > > this today. (And the second thing is that the church (and 
more 
> > the 
> > > > protestant, then the catholic) partly has done great harm on 
> > > > Freemasonry.) This got very clear for me, with the help of 
> > > > Theosophy. Freemasonry has no occult secrets any more, but 
still 
> > > > some secrets, those one find in every true Brothers heart. 
And 
> > the 
> > > > Freemasons are the Guardians of a Tradition, the Western 
> > Initiatoric 
> > > > Tradition of the ancient Mystery School. 
> > > > 
> > > > And, Carlos, don forget. That to study Western Freemasonry 
is 
> > > > obligatory for every student in a Mystery School in the 
East, 
> > and 
> > > > for every Chela.
> > > > 
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > 
> > > > Carl
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente 
Terra.
> > > > Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> > > > http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?
> > 
+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1162658970.532315.9433.almora.hst.terra.com.br
> > ,6542,Des15,Des15
> > > > 
> > > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> > > > Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 03/11/2006 / 
> > Versão: 4.4.00/4888
> > > > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente Terra.
> > Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> > http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?
+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1162787758.184227.22798.alcuta.terra.com.br,15
591,20031127114101,20031127114101
> > 
> > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> > Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 03/11/2006 / 
Versão: 4.4.00/4888
> > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
> > 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>