theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

E.R. is No E.S.

Oct 19, 2006 11:18 AM
by carlosaveline


Daniel,

Your points below have already been addressed by me. 

I will try to say that in a fews lines from another angle:


The Egyptian Rite is no  Esoteric School  and  it is far from being equivalent to one. 

I did not discuss any particular Esoteric School here, as long as I remember, 
as I do not feel  the Internet is the Forum for that.  Therefore my references to the Adyar ES here have been rather marginal.  

I have respect for the Adyar ES.

But the Egyptian Rite is an occult TRAP for souls -- a really secret trap above the Adyar ES and unknown even to most pledged members,  even 3rd degree. 

I do not criticize openly that which has even one percent of legitimacy.

But the ER is another thing. 

Best regards,   Carlos. 

  
De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Cópia:

Data:Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:05:47 -0000

Assunto:Theos-World Jake: Concerning Carlos & the Egyptian Rite & DES

> Jake,
> 
> Notice Carlos' posting at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/36361
> 
> Now Carlos brings up some interesting points in this posting.
> 
> These are legitimate issues here to be discussed. No doubt. And 
> the more that is known about these issues, the better. At least in
> my opinion.
> 
> But if one can ask hard questions about the Egyptian Rite
> and its influence on the exoteric TS Adyar, it is not
> such a leap to wonder if some of what Carlos says ALSO
> applies to other current esoteric/secret groups including the DES.
> 
> It was Gregory Tillett who posted some years ago on Theos-Talk
> the question which reads:
> 
> What has been the role of the DES (the ULT ES organization) in the
> control and/or management of the ULT?
> 
> If the Eygyptian Rite and the TS Adyar Esoteric Schools have had and 
> continue to have influence on the exoteric TS Adyar, then Tillett's 
> question is a natural one also to raise.
> 
> From what Walter Carrithers and others have told me, it is certainly 
> a legitimate question.
> 
> In Carlos' posting given above, he repeatedly writes 
> about "misleading secrecy" as concerning the Egyptian Rite. But 
> what about "misleading secrecy" as it applies to DES? Does it 
> apply? And if so, how? etc. etc.
> 
> Also notice another point Carlos brings up:
> 
> "I would not care to talk about that -- except for its dire 
> influence on a exoteric Society created by HPB to be an open forum 
> of search for Truth. And -- for the fact that its influence reaches 
> all of the movement, as there is no such thing as an 'occult 
> separation' among theosophical groups...."
> 
> Well, one might ask if this statement might also apply to the DES?
> Especially since Carlos assures us that :
> 
> "...there is no such thing as an 'occult separation' among 
> theosophical groups...."
> 
> What influence has there been? And could it be dire or otherwise?
> 
> I hope you and Carlos are not holding the position that it is more 
> than okay to discuss and even criticize one esoteric group but not 
> another. 
> 
> I approach all of this as an independent thinker and student. My 
> focus has been on Blavatsky --- her writings, the writings of her 
> Teachers, the history of her life, that is, material that helps one 
> to understand not only the teachings but the life, claims and work 
> of HPB. As to any of the claims, teachings and groups existing 
> AFTER 1891, I view them all with a healthy dose of 
> skepticism...trying to have an open mind but also asking hard 
> questions...certainly my association with Walter Carrithers helped 
> me to see the need for such an approach.
> 
> I view all existing theosophical groups with some reservation. 
> Certainly each of them have wonderful resources available, such as 
> libraries of books, publishing programs. I am convinced that the 
> vast majority of people in all these groups are good sincere 
> people...seekers of truth. But having said that, I do not mean that 
> I accept without question the various claims, etc. that have been 
> made since 1891 by the various leaders whether from the three major 
> theosophical groups today or other defunct groups such as Hargrove's 
> TS, etc. In light of all the conflicting claims and counterclaims 
> it is certainly wise to approach all such claims made by whomever 
> with healthy skepticism and hard questions.
> 
> That is my approach. I don't expect anyone else to hold my view. 
> People can believe or disbelieve in whatever as they so choose. 
> 
> Daniel
> http://hpb.cc
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente Terra.
> Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1161198444.867989.25927.baladonia.hst.terra.com.br,6798,Des15,Des15
> 
> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 17/10/2006 / Versão: 4.4.00/4875
> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application