Theos-Talk Archives (December 2005 Message tt00222)

I see all we need to read Mahatma Letters(at least 8 times) to A.P 
Sinnett and than look
what we have found there.
Maybe we all can agree in the same knowledge.
Universal knowledge.
Best wishes
Christina. ( some good idea?)






-- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Iain" <ibse03888@b...> wrote:
>
> Lenny,
> I feel sorry for Annand, and his inability to learn or to 
see beyond 
> what passes as his point of view. Who taught him? and why ? This is 
perhaps 
> the danger with cults or cult-like groups,who is controlling who?
AND FOR 
> WHAT PURPOSE? He does himself no favours nor Theosophy by his 
statements,but 
> when he makes them they have to be challenged which exposes his 
flawed point 
> of view and the more he labours the point the weaker his argument 
becomes 
> and so dissipates its effect. It was George Bernard Shaw who once 
said of a 
> critic " He has lost the art of conversation, but, unfortunatly not 
the 
> power of speech!"
> A sentiment that would apply in this case.I think I will contact 
someone at 
> Aydar who will review these postings and activities, and hopefully 
have "a 
> quiet word" and hopefully send him in the right direction.The 
Objects of 
> Theosophy are clearly not understood by Annand. Let us hope he 
will 
> reflect on the path he is taken, lets us hope he can read the sign 
posts.
> We must be patient with him, and show him kindness, from that he 
will learn 
> to understand. It is our duty to make him a Theosophist.
> cheers Iain
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <leonmaurer@a...>
> To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 12:59 AM
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Blavatsky's writing was the cause of . . . 
the TS 
> (that's the truth)
> 
> 
> Anand,
> Why would Blavatsky (if she could even have such control after 
death --  
> which
> she denied was possible) have played into your hands and allowed 
you to send
> that inflammatory subject line more than one time?
> 
> Wouldn't it be more likely that it's your own Blavatsky-hating 
inner self
> that is pushing your send button?
> 
> If so, your multiple posting and your apology appears to be another 
sly
> propaganda* ploy designed to cause dissension among theosophists 
and pit 
> brother
> against brother. When are you going to stop this nonsense? By 
now, you 
> have
> lost all your credibility and cannot convince any sincere theosophy 
students
> that anything you say is the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
> 
> Leonardo
> 
> *Adolph Hitler's propagandist, Joseph Goebbels said, "To make 
people believe
> a lie all you have to do is repeat it over and over again." Another 
of his
> tricks was to "imply a lie by telling the truth." It's the truth 
that 
> since HPB
> was the founding cause of the TS, every future action of it could be
> attributed to that cause, even though no such action was intended 
by the 
> founder. To
> the discerning reader, the wording of the original subject line 
assertion
> gives the lie away and exposes the evil intent. An intent of 
which the 
> author
> reverses by accusing others of the same crime, i.e., that all 
students of 
> HPB
> hate AB and CWL along with their pseudo theosophy. (Q.E.D.)
> 
> 
> 
> In a message dated 12/19/05 5:59:46 AM, AnandGholap@A... writes:
> 
> 
> > I am sorry. Reply was not going, so I pressed button many times. 
It
> > appears that it sent same post many times. Blavatsky might have 
done
> > something.
> >
> > Anand Gholap
> > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Anand Gholap" 
<AnandGholap@A..>
> > wrote:
> > >
> 
> > > Cass,
> > >
> > > > To look outside of Leadbeater and Besant into other cults,
> > > >suggests that your spiritual needs are not being met by 
theformer.
> > > > Cass
> > >
> > > I read some books of Rajnish before I even heard of TS and
> > > Theosophy.
> > > But philosophy of many other organizations did not satisfy me.
> > > Later, I somehow came across Theosophical lodge. Then I read 
many
> > > books of Besant, Leadbeater, Clara Codd and some other authors,
> > they
> > > completely satisfied me. So now I am happy.
> > >
> > > Anand Gholap
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Anand Gholap <AnandGholap@A...> wrote: Bart,
> > > > In the city where HQ of Rajnish is located, he is not 
criticized
> > > > much and they still have large number of followers. But as you
> > > said,
> > > > Osho Rajnish might still be criticized in some other parts of
> > the
> > > > world. Around 15 years back I bought and read some of his 
books,
> > > but
> > > > somehow I could not appreciate that much.
> > > > Even if I don't accept philosophy of some of other 
organizations
> > > > including that of Rajnish, I generally avoid to attack them.
> > > >
> > > > Anand Gholap
> > > >
> > > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Bart Lidofsky wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Anand Gholap wrote:
> > > > > > Many educated people follow Osho. He is no more criticized
> > > much.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you educate a donkey, you still have a donkey. And he is
> > > > certainly
> > > > > criticized. He was a rapist and a CONVICTED bioterrorist.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bart
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>