Theos-Talk Archives (December 2005 Message tt00221)

Gregory,
Thanks for more information.
I knew he have had a group and in churchway.
His book gives an easy explanation of the rounds,Time-era's and
periods of timeages.
Steiner is not wrong, only more practical .
All are split of theosophy.
And going on with their own toko.
Also Krishnamurti did.
Greetings Christina.








-- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, gregory@z... wrote:
>
> The reference to "Mario Schoenmaker, priest from Australia LCC" is 
not correct.
> Schoenmaker was originally a Congregationalist minister who 
developed an
> interest in things esoteric and led his church out of the 
Congregationalist
> Union into independent existence, first as The Church of the Mystic 
Christ and
> then as The Independent Church of Australia. He was interested for 
a time in
> the LCC, but eventually followed the teachings of Rudolph Steiner 
(whence came
> his teachings about men in/on/from the Moon), although he also 
claimed to have
> access to clairvoyance and thence to the Akashic Records. 
Schoenmaker died some
> years ago and was succeeded by his daughter, Antoinette. His volume 
on occult
> history is more Steiner than Leadbeater, and certainly not 
Blavatsky.
> 
> Alas, Leadbeater's account of what would be found if men ever 
landed on the Moon
> has not been vindicated (but then nor has the vision of the 
Mormon "prophet",
> Joseph Smith, on the same subject).
> 
> Dr Gregory Tillett
>