Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00465)

When I made my subscription on this yahoo-group I thought it would be centred on theosophical subjects. During the last weeks this list it’s been full of non-theosophical matters, according to my point of view. I still don’t understand what we can benefit from so many ridiculous messages send by some of the participants on this list. Why the moderator is not putting an end in so much “empty talks” (in a theosophical perspective)? Why so many participants of this list don’t have anything more to say than just rubbish? By the way, we will continue to talk over and over again on the same topics – “the Leadbeater affair”, “the Judge case”, “the so call Successions”; “the Adyar versus ULT”, etc., etc., etc.? – If we what to defend someone unjustly attacked it´s better, for example, to pay attention on what is happening whit the publication of the so call “Letters of H.P. Blavatsky”, conduted by John Algeo. Your beloved HPB is under fire! Well, and what about the study of Theosophy? For
example, I appreciate very much the contributions of brother Dallas TenBroeck, Danniel Caldwell, and many other, because, most of the time they try to discuss Theosophy (as presented by HPB and the Masters – remember Geotfrey Memorandum). 

When we want to say whatever comes to your mind we go to some chat room on the web, but if we what to discuss real Theosophy then we should be more responsible on every word we send to the list.

 

Joaquim Soares


		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]