theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Criticizing revered leaders under sweet name of philosophizing

Mar 17, 2005 05:29 PM
by nhcareyta


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Anand Gholap" <AnandGholap@A...> 
wrote:
> 
> I heard people are interested in their subconscious mind in certain 
> subjects like sex and then conscious mind finds reasons to discuss 
> that subject.

Dear Anand
Once again Perry is being denied his day in the court of natural 
justice. Once again you and others and unfortunately Mrs Burnier, are 
apparently diverting attention away from his questions. 

Nowhere in Perry's e.mail to Mrs Burnier does he mention Bishop 
Leadbeater's alleged sexual debauchery. Was Mrs Burnier advised that 
this was the subject of the letter and answered without actually 
reading it? Busy executives often rely on staff, trusting them to 
advise them appropriately.
You and others however have no such possible excuse, having direct 
exposure to Perry's e.mail and its reply.

Perry's question concerned the contradictions between the teachings 
of Madame Blavatsky and Bishop Leadbeater and whether there was any 
policy which disallowed debate of this subject in the Adyar 
Theosophical Society's official "publications and journals."

This question was not addressed. Instead Bishop Leadbeater's alleged 
paedophilia was raised. That is like asking someone what might be 
wrong with your motor vehicle and receiving the response that your 
house has a nice garden.
Why won't you and others answer the questions posed?

Why are you and others focusing on sex (Oh dear...an opening for 
Chuck) or your oft used statement "Criticizing revered leaders under 
sweet name of philosophizing." Is it an attempt to divert attention 
away from the questions asked? If so, it would appear to be treating 
Perry and others and thereby yourself with the utmost contempt. 

Bishop Leadbeater's very obvious untruths and the contradictions of 
his teachings with those of Madame Blavatsky, despite his claiming to 
be in contact with her same masters, demands the most vigorous 
investigation and critique because it directly addresses the issues 
of credibility and truth in reporting.

Have you and others no interest in credibility or truth or are you 
simply relaxing in self assured comfort?

Regards
Nigel










[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application