Theos-Talk Archives (February 2005 Message tt00682)

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, gregory <gregory@z...> wrote:

> His "insights" into Christian history (published by the Liberal 
Catholic Church) contradict all historical research.

As far I know no real christian history exists yet.
There is a pseudo-science called "biblical archaeology" which tries
to fit everything into the frames of Bible. No real traces of 
existence of Christ are found yet. Recently the gang of impostors was 
caught in Israel which fabricated many of those things which were in 
favour of popular version that Christ has born around 7 B.C. Among 
them are those from the grave of his brother which were regarded as a 
main proof.

Theosophists wrote that Christ really existed but for 100 years 
earlier, and they wrote so long before the Qumran manuscrips were 
found which describe a very alike person which lived just in that 
time. But he has some differences with the biblical Christ. It enabled 
materialists to say that there was no Christ at all but he is a 
mythical hero whose image was evolved step by step, and the 
manuscripts prove that. The only way to save the Saviour is to adopt 
theosophical theory that he really lived for 100 years earlier; 
otherwise we have to admit that he is a wholly ficticious person.

I have also read about a document subscribed by some archaeologists 
which verify Hodson's psychometric ovservations of some specimens 
which were presented by them to him.