Theos-Talk Archives (January 2005 Message tt00947)

I'm not sure of your meaning of "opinion." Perhaps the Masters, in 
their opinion, thought the manuscript was worth acquiring for their 
library. 
--j

>--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Jerry Hejka-Ekins <jjhe@c...> wrote:
>
>Try looking in C. Jinarajadasa's book Occult Investigations where the 
>author states that the Masters were so impressed with The Astral Plane 
>that they removed the original manuscript to one of their secret 
>libraries. 
> 
>
>prmoliveira wrote:
>
>I have and it still reads as an opinion to me, or have you found any
>printed corroboration of that opinion by Leadbeater himself?
>




>--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Jerry Hejka-Ekins <jjhe@c...> wrote:
>
>
> 
>
>>>Pedro wrote :
>>>"I have read it and I can't find any indication that he claimed that
>>>the book THE ASTRAL PLANE, or for that matter, any of his books, was
>>>certified, validated or authenticated by a Master!"
>>> 
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>Try looking in C. Jinarajadasa's book Occult Investigations where the 
>>author states that the Masters were so impressed with The Astral Plane 
>>that they removed the original manuscript to one of their secret 
>>libraries. 
>> 
>>
>
>
>I have and it still reads as an opinion to me, or have you found any
>printed corroboration of that opinion by Leadbeater himself?
>
>I have posted two quotes recently - one from the Introduction to THE
>ASTRAL PLANE and the other from MAN: WHENCE, HOW AND WHITHER - showing
>that both AB and CWL took responsibility for their books and publicly
>took the weaknesses and errors in them upon themselves, having stated
>that "there is no certainty that the idea presented before the
>hearer's mind will be an adequate representation of the truth."
>
>Would they have written that if their books had been certified,
>validated or authenticated by the Masters? 
>
>
>Pedro
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]