theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Theos-World Theosophistry in Fohat

Oct 04, 2004 05:29 PM
by Anand Gholap


Morten,
You said
" Then Blavatsky was guilty of doing something wrong
on many accounts - is this not true Anand?
(Do you need me to email some examples - before you are convinced?)"

This time you told truth. Are you sick today.

Anand Gholap


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten N. Olesen" <global-
theosophy@a...> wrote:
> 
> Then Blavatsky was guilty of doing something wrong
> on many accounts - is this not true Anand?
> (Do you need me to email some examples - before you are convinced?)
> 
> My theosophical view is:
> If it is you experience, that someone is doing something wrong.
> Should you then not seek to help that individual - even if others 
who
> are filled with prejudice go and say that you are - criticizing, 
shame on
> you???
> Or similar.
> 
> Anand asked:
> "Are discussion groups formed to discuss principles of Theosophy or
> criticizing leaders of other organizations."
> 
> I would theosophically speaking say both - if the critic being
> given are motivated by compassion to help that individual or other
> individuals, who
> connected with the situation one way or the other.
> Without a critical stance towards any teaching - and by just 
absorbing
> anything being presented to one self, - one is most likely at risk 
of being
> indorctrinated or as some would say - brainwashed into false 
glamourous
> views.
> 
> My view is, that the promotion of author with a dubious reputation -
> is not theosophical - unless the dubious repuation are refuted.
> 
> The problem as I see it is:
> When is one making a critic out of ill will and when is it motivated
> by compassion. Those who are not aware of the facts - but
> only assumes that they are - should better hold their tounge where 
it
> belongs.
> 
> May I ask a question:
> What stance has TS Adyar today on masutbation practises
> among the young theosophists and the leaders?
> Try to read this link before answering:
> Annie Besant - at the Court 1913
> http://www.parascience.org/besant.htm
> 
> 
> 
> from
> M. Sufilight with peace andlove...
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Anand Gholap" <AnandGholap@A...>
> To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 10:33 PM
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Theosophistry in Fohat
> 
> 
> >
> >
> > Criticizing respected author of other organization is as wrong as
> > christion criticizing Buddha or buddhist criticizing Christ. Are
> > discussion groups formed to discuss principles of Theosophy or
> > criticizing leaders of other organizations.
> > Anand Gholap
> >
> >
> > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten N. Olesen" <global-
> > theosophy@a...> wrote:
> > > My views are:
> > >
> > > Well...
> > >
> > > I will have to ask you politely and wellmeaning:
> > > Is it not also a question about whether one
> > > actually "see bad in authors out of proportion" or Not ?
> > >
> > > How much bad is allowed from any author of wellknown 
theosophical
> > admiration
> > > before - enough is enough?
> > > Is there no limit?
> > > And if there is a limit, where do you Anand think it is?
> > > And who decides this?
> > >
> > > from
> > > M. Sufilight
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > From: "Anand Gholap" <AnandGholap@A...>
> > > To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 9:11 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Theos-World Theosophistry in Fohat
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > That's right. Especially when all so called Theosophical 
Societies
> > > > have main object Universal Brotherhood and when members see 
bad in
> > > > authors out of proportion, then something is wrong.
> > > > Fraternally,
> > > > Anand Gholap
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "clarity12.1@j..."
> > > > <clarity12.1@j...> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > What would it take to drop politics from the very word
> > theosophy.
> > > > it has so much baggage, that the word itself, detracts even 
more
> > that
> > > > it might attract. How much time do we take in addressing the 
very
> > > > long file of ts players. Does this practice not keep us off 
the
> > task
> > > > of practicing the principles we seem to more or less agree 
that
> > exist-
> > > > -self existent.
> > > > >
> > > > > If we only concentrate on the pure principles, without the
> > relative
> > > > bias interference, then would we not be practicing a form of
> > > > meditation, I call conscious communication? Language that
> > divides,
> > > > regardless of it's astute intelluectual power, is still a 
breach
> > of
> > > > the so called oneness that we essentially are.
> > > > > Or is this view naive?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regina
> > > > >
> > > > > 
________________________________________________________________
> > > > > Get your name as your email address.
> > > > > Includes spam protection, 1GB storage, no ads and more
> > > > > Only $1.99/ month - visit http://www.mysite.com/name today!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >






[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application