theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Theos-World Theosophistry in Fohat

Oct 04, 2004 05:20 PM
by Morten N. Olesen


Then Blavatsky was guilty of doing something wrong
on many accounts - is this not true Anand?
(Do you need me to email some examples - before you are convinced?)

My theosophical view is:
If it is you experience, that someone is doing something wrong.
Should you then not seek to help that individual - even if others who
are filled with prejudice go and say that you are - criticizing, shame on
you???
Or similar.

Anand asked:
"Are discussion groups formed to discuss principles of Theosophy or
criticizing leaders of other organizations."

I would theosophically speaking say both - if the critic being
given are motivated by compassion to help that individual or other
individuals, who
connected with the situation one way or the other.
Without a critical stance towards any teaching - and by just absorbing
anything being presented to one self, - one is most likely at risk of being
indorctrinated or as some would say - brainwashed into false glamourous
views.

My view is, that the promotion of author with a dubious reputation -
is not theosophical - unless the dubious repuation are refuted.

The problem as I see it is:
When is one making a critic out of ill will and when is it motivated
by compassion. Those who are not aware of the facts - but
only assumes that they are - should better hold their tounge where it
belongs.

May I ask a question:
What stance has TS Adyar today on masutbation practises
among the young theosophists and the leaders?
Try to read this link before answering:
Annie Besant - at the Court 1913
http://www.parascience.org/besant.htm



from
M. Sufilight with peace andlove...



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anand Gholap" <AnandGholap@AnandGholap.org>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Theosophistry in Fohat


>
>
> Criticizing respected author of other organization is as wrong as
> christion criticizing Buddha or buddhist criticizing Christ. Are
> discussion groups formed to discuss principles of Theosophy or
> criticizing leaders of other organizations.
> Anand Gholap
>
>
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten N. Olesen" <global-
> theosophy@a...> wrote:
> > My views are:
> >
> > Well...
> >
> > I will have to ask you politely and wellmeaning:
> > Is it not also a question about whether one
> > actually "see bad in authors out of proportion" or Not ?
> >
> > How much bad is allowed from any author of wellknown theosophical
> admiration
> > before - enough is enough?
> > Is there no limit?
> > And if there is a limit, where do you Anand think it is?
> > And who decides this?
> >
> > from
> > M. Sufilight
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Anand Gholap" <AnandGholap@A...>
> > To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 9:11 PM
> > Subject: Re: Theos-World Theosophistry in Fohat
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > That's right. Especially when all so called Theosophical Societies
> > > have main object Universal Brotherhood and when members see bad in
> > > authors out of proportion, then something is wrong.
> > > Fraternally,
> > > Anand Gholap
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "clarity12.1@j..."
> > > <clarity12.1@j...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > What would it take to drop politics from the very word
> theosophy.
> > > it has so much baggage, that the word itself, detracts even more
> that
> > > it might attract. How much time do we take in addressing the very
> > > long file of ts players. Does this practice not keep us off the
> task
> > > of practicing the principles we seem to more or less agree that
> exist-
> > > -self existent.
> > > >
> > > > If we only concentrate on the pure principles, without the
> relative
> > > bias interference, then would we not be practicing a form of
> > > meditation, I call conscious communication? Language that
> divides,
> > > regardless of it's astute intelluectual power, is still a breach
> of
> > > the so called oneness that we essentially are.
> > > > Or is this view naive?
> > > >
> > > > Regina
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________________________________________
> > > > Get your name as your email address.
> > > > Includes spam protection, 1GB storage, no ads and more
> > > > Only $1.99/ month - visit http://www.mysite.com/name today!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application