Theos-Talk Archives (October 2004 Message tt00093)

My views are:

Well...

I will have to ask you politely and wellmeaning:
Is it not also a question about whether one
actually "see bad in authors out of proportion" or Not ?

How much bad is allowed from any author of wellknown theosophical admiration
before - enough is enough?
Is there no limit?
And if there is a limit, where do you Anand think it is?
And who decides this?

from
M. Sufilight



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anand Gholap" <AnandGholap@AnandGholap.org>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Theosophistry in Fohat


>
>
> That's right. Especially when all so called Theosophical Societies
> have main object Universal Brotherhood and when members see bad in
> authors out of proportion, then something is wrong.
> Fraternally,
> Anand Gholap
>
>
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "clarity12.1@j..."
> <clarity12.1@j...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > What would it take to drop politics from the very word theosophy.
> it has so much baggage, that the word itself, detracts even more that
> it might attract. How much time do we take in addressing the very
> long file of ts players. Does this practice not keep us off the task
> of practicing the principles we seem to more or less agree that exist-
> -self existent.
> >
> > If we only concentrate on the pure principles, without the relative
> bias interference, then would we not be practicing a form of
> meditation, I call conscious communication? Language that divides,
> regardless of it's astute intelluectual power, is still a breach of
> the so called oneness that we essentially are.
> > Or is this view naive?
> >
> > Regina
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________
> > Get your name as your email address.
> > Includes spam protection, 1GB storage, no ads and more
> > Only $1.99/ month - visit http://www.mysite.com/name today!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>