Theos-Talk Archives (October 2004 Message tt00092)

That's right. Especially when all so called Theosophical Societies 
have main object Universal Brotherhood and when members see bad in 
authors out of proportion, then something is wrong.
Fraternally,
Anand Gholap


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "clarity12.1@j..." 
<clarity12.1@j...> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> What would it take to drop politics from the very word theosophy. 
it has so much baggage, that the word itself, detracts even more that 
it might attract. How much time do we take in addressing the very 
long file of ts players. Does this practice not keep us off the task 
of practicing the principles we seem to more or less agree that exist-
-self existent.
> 
> If we only concentrate on the pure principles, without the relative 
bias interference, then would we not be practicing a form of 
meditation, I call conscious communication? Language that divides, 
regardless of it's astute intelluectual power, is still a breach of 
the so called oneness that we essentially are. 
> Or is this view naive?
> 
> Regina
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> Get your name as your email address.
> Includes spam protection, 1GB storage, no ads and more
> Only $1.99/ month - visit http://www.mysite.com/name today!