Theos-Talk Archives (July 2004 Message tt00345)

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Daniel H. Caldwell" 
<danielhcaldwell@y...> wrote:


> I'm curious. 
> 
> What year do you believe Charles Webster 
> Leadbeater was born?
> 
> And what documents is your answer based on?


Sometimes I have the impression of being attending an interminable 
last session of a Holy Inquisition-like tribunal, with Leadbeater as 
the subject being judged. The representatives of the Holy Universal 
Blavatskyan Assembly (HUBA) have decreed that CWL's trial shall 
continue for ever and ever, yes, until the end of the Manvantara. 
His main sin? To have written and taught teachings that the HUBA 
totally disapproves of. For example, he invented the preposterous 
notion of an "etheric double", a heresy never to be forgiven, quite 
dangerous indeed. He declared that a poor and malnourished South 
Indian boy would one day become a spiritual teacher and a great 
speaker, greater even than Annie Besant, most horrendous heresy and 
blasphemy according to the theological principles of HUBA.

He also wrote, in 1910, that one day Europe would constitute a 
Federation of nations with a common Parliament, to which the member-
states would send representatives. HUBA does not seem to have an 
immediate problem with that, but it finds it is easier to ignore it 
and therefore chooses to concentrate on accusations like the ones 
mentioned above. 

HUBA has appropriated the word 'Theosophy' as an ideological patent 
which exists as the sixth 'skandha' in the manasic field of their 
members. One of the mantras practised daily by HUBA members 
is "Theosophy is Blavatsky. Blavatsky is Theosophy". This is called 
the 'HUBA Sutra' and its daily practice strengthens the Assembly and 
gives energy for those presiding over Leadbeater's trial. It has to, 
as the trial will go on for another 311,040,000,000,000 years.

The HUBA's Four Sentimental Propositions are:

1. Only what H. P. Blavatsky wrote is Theosophy.

2. We don't care if HPB herself does not agree with Proposition no. 
1 above.

3. All the writers who do not belong to a Blavatskyan descent should 
be permanently exposed, by every possible mean, until the end of the 
cycle.

4. There is no independent thinking in HUBA - only Blavatskyan-
centred thinking. 


As I step out of the HUBA courtroom I see people, cars, trees, 
skyes, movement. I hear news about Iraq, Kerry, Halliburton, Darfur, 
activism, young people. A vast wide world. A world HUBA members 
don't have time to see as their energies are consumed in the trial 
of the manvantara.


Pedro