Theos-Talk Archives (March 2004 Message tt00428)

> From: Pedro Oliveira <prmoliveira@yahoo.com>
> Reply-To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Who dictated Alice Bailey's books?
> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:34:41 -0800 (PST)
>
>
> > I think you've got your terms mixed up, besides
> > splitting hairs over who
> > meant what. Firstly, Karma is not Compassion, nor
> > compassionate- far from
> > it. Perhaps you mean "Dharma", not "Karma"? Karma is
> > cold, unfeeling, the
> > Cosmic Law that Newton's laws of physics echoes.
> > Secondly, the 'dropping'
> > refers to an act by the School, not Karma- although
> > there may have been some
> > 'dropping' of key words.
>
> > regards-
> >
> > ALi
>
> I was replying to Morten's statement:
>
> "The Arcane School if it was (and is) a real School of
> Wisdom will because of
> the laws of Karma have to
> drop certain (and not "all" - Bailey didn't say "all")
> emotional aspirants
> and other persons, who wouldn't or
> will not fit the pattern."
>
> I was referring to Karma, not Dharma. Even a cursory
> reading of the Mahatma Letters shows that their
> philosophy cannot be understood in terms of Newtonian
> physics. If the universal laws emanate from a Source
> described as Sat, Chit, Ananda, which can be roughly
> translated as Boundless Existence, Universal
> Intelligence and Absolute Bliss, there may be nothing
> "cold" about them. It is interesting that those who
> have become one with the Law are the most
> compassionate and the most wise among human beings.
That is true, but I think you put the cart before the horse. Imo, it is 
their very innate compassion/Love-Wisdom that allows them to master and 
overcome the law, rather than the other way round.


> And is it not compassionate a Law that returns to you
> the quality of your very action, though and feeling,
> as well as motive, so that you can learn to look at
> yourself, heal your mind from the age-old disease of
> separateness and become another beneficent force in
> Nature?
I think not, since for ageless eons, we have committed actions, thoughts, 
feelings without any sense of self or direction or learning. We were 
products of the Law under the Law, to paraphrase someone, maybe Paul. The 
Law is never compassionate, nor beneficient. It is merely the Law. The Way 
things are is not the Way.

> But, I may be wrong, although I have hardly any hair
> left to split.
lol! I'm sure it was compassionately sacrificed!

> fraternal regards,
>
> Pedro
regards-

Ali

_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! 
http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/