Theos-Talk Archives (March 2004 Message tt00236)

Hallo all of you,

My views are:

Some would say she did (or D.K.) did by issuing the Tibetan declaration at
the beginning of each Bailey book.


from
M. Sufilight with peace and love

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "arielaretziel" <arielaretziel@yahoo.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 6:32 PM
Subject: Theos-World Alice Bailey and her Interpretation of Theosophy


>
>
>
> Dear all, I hope this does not get taken in the wrong way. But in my
> opinion, Bailey should have prefaced all her work with "IN MY OPINION"
>
> I'm sure you will , as one person put it, "cull" much of the good
> from her material, but it is also important to recognise many of the
> faults. You may also miss some real treasures in the Secret Doctrine
> because you have held to one interpretation, that is Baileys, and
> have not had time to take a second look and really understand certain
> passages.
>
> Now I'm not an Anti-Bailey person. But I doubt a master like DK would
> make so many obvious mistakes. And it would be a shame if The Secret
> Doctrine becomes nothing but a series of footnotes to a work(like
> Cosmic Fire) that really doesn't explain The Secret Doctrine.
>
> Ariel
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>